2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial Intelligence–Based Autosegmentation: Advantages in Delineation, Absorbed Dose-Distribution, and Logistics

Gustavo R. Sarria,
Fabian Kugel,
Fred Roehner
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we advocate fully automatic methods for contour initialisation, together with the development of intuitive tools that allow specialists to modify the fully automatically generated contour if they feel the need to do so. This point of view is in line with current clinical practice, where the specialist follows contouring guidelines from respected entities such as the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, the American Society for Radiation Oncology, or the Global Harmonization Group [59], while being allowed to use built-in auto-delineation and interpolation tools [60]. We therefore agree with Sarria et al [60] in that, while AI can improve the accuracy and consistency of contouring, it cannot replace the knowledge and clinical judgement of radiation oncologists, physicists, or radiation therapists.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, we advocate fully automatic methods for contour initialisation, together with the development of intuitive tools that allow specialists to modify the fully automatically generated contour if they feel the need to do so. This point of view is in line with current clinical practice, where the specialist follows contouring guidelines from respected entities such as the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, the American Society for Radiation Oncology, or the Global Harmonization Group [59], while being allowed to use built-in auto-delineation and interpolation tools [60]. We therefore agree with Sarria et al [60] in that, while AI can improve the accuracy and consistency of contouring, it cannot replace the knowledge and clinical judgement of radiation oncologists, physicists, or radiation therapists.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…This point of view is in line with current clinical practice, where the specialist follows contouring guidelines from respected entities such as the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, the American Society for Radiation Oncology, or the Global Harmonization Group [59], while being allowed to use built-in auto-delineation and interpolation tools [60]. We therefore agree with Sarria et al [60] in that, while AI can improve the accuracy and consistency of contouring, it cannot replace the knowledge and clinical judgement of radiation oncologists, physicists, or radiation therapists. AI should be used as a tool to support and optimise clinical decision making and not as a substitute for human expertise.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%