2018
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/402/1/012159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial intelligence based defect classification for weld joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So the efficient identification of holes, grooves, cracks, keyholes, and flash defects is realized. In 2018, traditional networks are used to classify and recognize ultrasonic signals of stainless steel weld defects by Florence et al [24] at SSN College of Engineering in India, the classification of four types of defects including porosity, cracks, incomplete penetration and incomplete fusion is realized through the Back Propagation Network. Ultrasonic phased array technology is used by Murta [25] in the United States for defect analysis, and it is found that the classification of defects by this method relies heavily on experiences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So the efficient identification of holes, grooves, cracks, keyholes, and flash defects is realized. In 2018, traditional networks are used to classify and recognize ultrasonic signals of stainless steel weld defects by Florence et al [24] at SSN College of Engineering in India, the classification of four types of defects including porosity, cracks, incomplete penetration and incomplete fusion is realized through the Back Propagation Network. Ultrasonic phased array technology is used by Murta [25] in the United States for defect analysis, and it is found that the classification of defects by this method relies heavily on experiences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%