2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial Intelligence based detection of pneumoperitoneum on CT scans in patients presenting with acute abdominal pain: A clinical diagnostic test accuracy study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically, AI algorithms have encountered challenges when attempting to detect free air in CT scans. They often exhibit reduced sensitivity, even if their specificity is commendable 17,18 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Historically, AI algorithms have encountered challenges when attempting to detect free air in CT scans. They often exhibit reduced sensitivity, even if their specificity is commendable 17,18 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, AI algorithms have encountered challenges when attempting to detect free air in CT scans. They often exhibit reduced sensitivity, even if their specificity is commendable 17,18 . Previous studies, focusing on the utilization of 2D segmentation models for pneumoperitoneum detection, have highlighted challenges in differentiating free air from the common place bowel gas 18 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since then, AI has begun to play a crucial role in the healthcare system and has been consistently optimized. Brejnebøl et al ( 58 ) demonstrated that AI algorithms based on CT scans have benefited the diagnosis of patients with acute appendicitis, albeit with low sensitivity ( 58 ). In a recent review, Lam et al confirmed the significant role of AI in predicting acute appendicitis and emphasized the need for its development in terms of clinical usability ( 59 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%