2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial intelligence-based identification of butter variations as a model study for detecting food adulteration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The entire setup must be enclosed within a plastic amplifier so that the sound waves produced from the speaker will not be reflected and scattered. The sound produced must be recorded by capturing the sound using a condenser microphone which is sensitive to sounds (8,9). The spectrum can be recorded from the microphone using an apparatus called DSO.…”
Section: Methods Using Acousticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entire setup must be enclosed within a plastic amplifier so that the sound waves produced from the speaker will not be reflected and scattered. The sound produced must be recorded by capturing the sound using a condenser microphone which is sensitive to sounds (8,9). The spectrum can be recorded from the microphone using an apparatus called DSO.…”
Section: Methods Using Acousticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the paper of Linko [16], that advantages that an expert system could have in the food industry is explained. In recent years, with the growth of artificial intelligence, expert systems are considered an approach to artificial intelligence and are used to improve their solutions in [17][18][19]. While [17] is focused on a review of the chemical industry, [18] is focused on detection of food adulteration.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, with the growth of artificial intelligence, expert systems are considered an approach to artificial intelligence and are used to improve their solutions in [17][18][19]. While [17] is focused on a review of the chemical industry, [18] is focused on detection of food adulteration. In the case of [19], Jha et al present also a review, but in this case focused on automation in agriculture.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Wojcik and Jakubowska (2021) used a deep neural network to predict adulteration in apple juice with an R2 prediction that reached 0.98. Moreover, the AI has successfully detected butter counterfeit with 82.66% accuracy (Iymen et al, 2020). Likewise, Support Vector Machine (SVM) (kind of AI) can detect cassava starch adulteration (86.9% accuracy) (Cardoso & Poppi, 2021) and white rice counterfeiting (90% accuracy) (Lim et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%