2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.168789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial intelligence based quality of transmission predictive model for cognitive optical networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At last, a hybrid NN using group teaching algorithm was presented for determining the optimal route. Vaiyapuri et al [14] presented an IoT-assisted cluster-based routing (CBR) method for information-centric WSNs (ICWSN), named CBR-ICWSN. The proposed method undergoes a black widow optimization (BWO)-founded gathering approach for efficiently choosing an optimal set of CHs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At last, a hybrid NN using group teaching algorithm was presented for determining the optimal route. Vaiyapuri et al [14] presented an IoT-assisted cluster-based routing (CBR) method for information-centric WSNs (ICWSN), named CBR-ICWSN. The proposed method undergoes a black widow optimization (BWO)-founded gathering approach for efficiently choosing an optimal set of CHs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, an expanded Muirhead mean operator was developed to determine the amounts of reliance between the activities of consecutive operators. Finally, empirical medical dependency analysis is used to demonstrate the applicability and effectiveness of the presented LGDA model [ 11 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we validate the proposed model performance under several aspects. Table 1 investigates the performance of the feature selection techniques in terms of classification accuracy under different sets of training data and varying number of residuals [ 34 , 35 ]. Figure 4 examines the result analysis of different feature selection techniques in terms of classification accuracy on 60% of training data.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%