2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2022.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial intelligence for basal cell carcinoma: diagnosis and distinction from histological mimics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a combination is similar to pathologist's diagnostic thinking and is expected to be applied in clinical practice. When dealing with common clinical problem (hesitation between BCC and TE), the differentiation classifier can discriminate BCC from TE in model setting with comparable performance to some of previous studies 17,19 . The performance of the this classifiers is above mean level (sensitivity = 89.2%, specificity = 81.1%) for machine learning in the diagnosis of non‐melanoma skin cancers, but under the top level to differentiate BCC from TE (recall = 100%) 17,19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such a combination is similar to pathologist's diagnostic thinking and is expected to be applied in clinical practice. When dealing with common clinical problem (hesitation between BCC and TE), the differentiation classifier can discriminate BCC from TE in model setting with comparable performance to some of previous studies 17,19 . The performance of the this classifiers is above mean level (sensitivity = 89.2%, specificity = 81.1%) for machine learning in the diagnosis of non‐melanoma skin cancers, but under the top level to differentiate BCC from TE (recall = 100%) 17,19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…17,19 However, the later model was trained only on 5 sections of TE and test on one slide to differentiate BCC from TE. 17 The small sample size of TE and single center study reduced its confidence of differentiation, while our differentiation classifier is or surrounding tumor nodules. 5 The most suggestive indicator of minimum distance between tumor nuclei is T-T_meanEdgeLength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Numerous studies were concerned with the use of DL models for detection of basal cell carcinomas. [25][26][27][28][29][30][31] As the most common human malignant skin tumor in Central Europe with annually increasing incidence rates, basal cell carcinoma (BCC) represents a major portion of samples submitted to dermatopathology labs. 32 At the same time, BCCs are well suited for establishing automated AI-based image recognition due to their clear histological criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dabei zeigten DL‐Algorithmen gute Ergebnisse bei der Diagnose von Onychomykosen, entzündlichen Dermatosen und kutanen Lymphomen, melanozytären Läsionen sowie Tumoren aus der Gruppe der nichtmelanotischen Hautkrebserkrankungen (NMSC) 11–24 . Zahlreiche Untersuchungen beschäftigten sich mit der Anwendung von DL‐Modellen zur Erkennung von Basalzellkarzinomen 25–31 . Das Basalzellkarzinom (BCC) stellt als häufigster maligner Hauttumor des Menschen in Zentraleuropa mit jährlich steigenden Inzidenzraten einen Großteil des Einsendeguts von dermatopathologischen Laboren dar 32 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified