2019
DOI: 10.1101/561027
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial Intelligence for Bioinformatics: Applications in Protein Folding Prediction

Abstract: AI recently shows great promise in the field of bioinformatics, such as protein structure prediction. The Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction (CASP) is a nationwide experiment that takes place biannually, which centered around analyzing the best current systems for predicting protein tertiary structures. In this paper, we research on available AI methods and features, and then explore novel methods based on reinforcement learning. Such method will have profound implications for R&D in bioinform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is generally assumed that DL methods perform better than do other ML-based algorithms, 32 which has been widely applied in protein structure and function prediction. [33][34][35][36][37][38][39] However, SMD6A consistently outperformed the DL-based method, iDNA6mA, on both benchmark and independent datasets, further emphasizing that systematic selection of feature encodings and two-layer ensemble models are essential for improved prediction. Furthermore, McNemar's chi-square test was used to determine whether the differences between SDM6A and existing predictors were statistically significant.…”
Section: Comparing the Performance Of Sdm6a With That Of The Existing Predictormentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It is generally assumed that DL methods perform better than do other ML-based algorithms, 32 which has been widely applied in protein structure and function prediction. [33][34][35][36][37][38][39] However, SMD6A consistently outperformed the DL-based method, iDNA6mA, on both benchmark and independent datasets, further emphasizing that systematic selection of feature encodings and two-layer ensemble models are essential for improved prediction. Furthermore, McNemar's chi-square test was used to determine whether the differences between SDM6A and existing predictors were statistically significant.…”
Section: Comparing the Performance Of Sdm6a With That Of The Existing Predictormentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We also explore machine learning technique for this problem since it has been successfully and widely applied to solve problems in different fields, including image recognition, bioinformatics, voice recognition, drug discovery, etc. [6,7,8,9,10] 1 Mathematical models…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%