2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40808-020-01041-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial intelligence for surface water quality monitoring and assessment: a systematic literature analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
44
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
3
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This popularity agrees with the observation of other reviews on the application of ML for WQA [88,106,107]. Apart from their more accessible calibration, robustness, and capability to process nonlinear and complex datasets [106,107], this trend can be attributed to the ANN technique requiring a fairly small amount of data to produce satisfactory prediction results [108]. Even though random forest (RF) and multiple linear regression (MLR) were both predicted eight times, the high number of RF applications can be attributed to the fact that RF is classified as follows [85,109,110]:…”
Section: Commonly Used Modeling Approachessupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This popularity agrees with the observation of other reviews on the application of ML for WQA [88,106,107]. Apart from their more accessible calibration, robustness, and capability to process nonlinear and complex datasets [106,107], this trend can be attributed to the ANN technique requiring a fairly small amount of data to produce satisfactory prediction results [108]. Even though random forest (RF) and multiple linear regression (MLR) were both predicted eight times, the high number of RF applications can be attributed to the fact that RF is classified as follows [85,109,110]:…”
Section: Commonly Used Modeling Approachessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Therefore, as seen in Figure 4, it is not surprising that artificial neural network (ANN) related algorithms are the most applied ML techniques. This popularity agrees with the observation of other reviews on the application of ML for WQA [88,106,107]. Apart from their more accessible calibration, robustness, and capability to process nonlinear and complex datasets [106,107], this trend can be attributed to the ANN technique requiring a fairly small amount of data to produce satisfactory prediction results [108].…”
Section: Commonly Used Modeling Approachessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The bore wells from which samples were gathered are widely utilized for drinking purposes. Water quality variables, such as pH, TDS, EC, Cl, SO 4 , nitrate, carbonate, bicarbonate, metal ions, and trace elements, have been predicted (Ighalo et al, 2021). They emphasized predicting water quality by using the ML classifier algorithm C5.0, naïve Bayes, and RF as leaners for water quality prediction with high precision and effectiveness.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Ighalo et al (2021), the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) are the most utilized AI models for water quality monitoring and assessment systems, which include the usage of solar energy, in the last decade. The advantages of using AI methods in various monitoring and assessment application areas are that they are faster and more efficient than linear mathematical or statistical methods, low-cost, can be used for real-time monitoring (Yetilmezsoy et al, 2011;Ighalo et al, 2021;Demetillo et al, 2019), and ensure lower error values in prediction (Karaboga and Kaya, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%