2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial intelligence in early childhood education: A scoping review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In another meta-analysis study, the effect size of the immersive VR was small and significantly differentiated across educational levels (Coban et al, 2022 ). The impact of AI on education was investigated by Su and Yang ( 2022 ) and Su et al ( 2022 ), who showed that this technology significantly improved students’ understanding of AI computer science and machine learning concepts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another meta-analysis study, the effect size of the immersive VR was small and significantly differentiated across educational levels (Coban et al, 2022 ). The impact of AI on education was investigated by Su and Yang ( 2022 ) and Su et al ( 2022 ), who showed that this technology significantly improved students’ understanding of AI computer science and machine learning concepts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specific positive learning gains were reported in a number of skills, e.g., problem-solving skills and pattern exploration skills (Higgins et al, 2012 ), metacognitive learning outcomes (Verschaffel et al, 2019 ), literacy skills, computational thinking skills, emotion control skills, and collaborative inquiry skills (Lu et al, 2022 ; Su & Yang, 2022 ; Su et al, 2022 ). Additionally, several investigations have reported benefits from the use of ICT on students’ creativity (Fielding & Murcia, 2022 ; Liu et al, 2022 ; Quah & Ng, 2022 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resulting from our approach, we discovered that most of the reviewed papers of studies leaned towards teaching ML to high schoolers. Literature (Su & Yang, 2022) has shown that limited discussion exists about AI activities appropriate for younger children, however, studies have been carried out to introduce ML at early years of pupils' generation of ML knowledge (Druga et al, 2019;Vartiainen et al, 2020aVartiainen et al, , 2020b. Nevertheless, no basis could be identified to assume that high schools are the levels that requires ML knowledge, it is essential to conduct research on ML projects suitable for kindergarten, elementary and middle schools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worthy of note that this work was founded on forty-three (43) paper identified with definite search principles in six databases. Previous studies have concluded based on lesser articles such as Barreto and Benitti, (2012) that reviewed 10 articles and Su and Yang (2022) who concluded based on 17 articles. Though other criteria, strategy and online bibliographic databases may have generated more papers.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the enormous impact of modern technology tools on the education system, numerous teaching staff are becoming more willing to incorporate them into their teaching activities ( Blackwell et al, 2014 ; Bourbour Hosseinbeigi, 2020 ; Undheim, 2021 ). It is necessary to surround the child with such an environment and such a system of relationships that stimulates the most diverse independent activities of the child and to form exactly what the child at the right time is able to perform ( Plumb and Kautz, 2016 ; Yilmaz, 2016 ; Su and Yang, 2022 ).…”
Section: Digital Instruments In Preschool Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%