2023
DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2023.2184685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial intelligence in medical device software and high-risk medical devices – a review of definitions, expert recommendations and regulatory initiatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Distinct steps of development (training and testing), validation and clinical evaluation of machine learning-based algorithms for diagnosis or prediction purposes have been established ( 39 42 ). In the case of machine learning-derived tools either as standalone medical device software or embedded within an intracoronary imaging modality, there are additional challenges to be considered ( 43 ). A few studies have already reported effective applications of automatic ICI evaluation in a clinical context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distinct steps of development (training and testing), validation and clinical evaluation of machine learning-based algorithms for diagnosis or prediction purposes have been established ( 39 42 ). In the case of machine learning-derived tools either as standalone medical device software or embedded within an intracoronary imaging modality, there are additional challenges to be considered ( 43 ). A few studies have already reported effective applications of automatic ICI evaluation in a clinical context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precise definitions and classifications for medical device software and AI systems differ between jurisdictions but in general AI or ML-based tools or algorithms when used for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes, including applications for GI endoscopy, will meet the definition of a medical device and should be appropriately developed and evaluated before they are approved for clinical use in accordance with the relevant regional regulation[ 47 ]. Similarly, clinical research including pilot studies to generate the clinical data required to validate and appraise novel and uncertified AI tools in endoscopy should be performed in accordance with applicable regulatory and ethical requirements.…”
Section: Regulation Supervision and Accountabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the regulatory process can be lengthy, complex, and costly, and lack of clarity regarding the regulatory framework for AI-based medical devices can hinder their adoption. This limits the ability to develop and deploy AI algorithms rapidly [ 75 , 76 ].…”
Section: Expert Opinionmentioning
confidence: 99%