Artificial Intelligence in Swedish Policies: Values, Benefits, Considerations and Risks

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is said to be the next big phase in digitalization. There is a global ongoing race to develop, implement and make use of AI in both the private and public sector. The many responsibilities of governments in this race are complicated and cut across a number of areas. Therefore, it is important that the use of AI supports these diverse aspects of governmental commitments and values. The aim of this paper is to analyze how AI is portrayed in Swedish policy documents and what values are attributed to the use of AI. We analyze Swedish policy documents and map benefits, considerations and risks with AI into different value ideals, based on an established e-government value framework. We conclude that there is a discrepancy in the policy level discourse on the use of AI between different value ideals. Our findings show that AI is strongly associated with improving efficiency and service quality in line with previous e-government policy studies. Interestingly, few benefits are highlighted concerning engagement of citizens in policy making. A more nuanced view on AI is needed for creating realistic expectations on how this technology can benefit society.

Governing Ethical AI Transformation: A Case Study of AuroraAI

“…In terms of data and privacy issues, the challenges faced by the public are well-documented and range from the unethical use of data (Gupta, 2019 ), lack of data privacy (Valle-Cruz et al, 2019 ), to challenges with data security (Toll et al, 2019 ). Public users are worried about novel challenges to the privacy of data in AI systems for governments (Fatima et al, 2020 ) and how to curtail privacy violations (Kuziemski and Misuraca, 2020 ).…”

Understanding the Determinants in the Different Government AI Adoption Stages: Evidence of Local Government Chatbots in China

“…Artificial intelligence (AI) has an evolution that spans more than 60 years (McCarthy et al, 1955), and its trajectory has consisted of winters and springs (Natale & Ballatore, 2017; Toll et al, 2019). With the rapid development of big data and deep learning, AI has entered a new stage in recent years (Desouza, 2018; Makridakis, 2017).…”

“…With the rapid development of big data and deep learning, AI has entered a new stage in recent years (Desouza, 2018; Makridakis, 2017). In the research on AI, some scholars consider AI as a necessity for creating and maintaining a functioning society and portray AI as human beings’ best hope to prevent extinction (Gurkaynak et al, 2016; Toll et al, 2019), whereas others describe it as a threat, even asserting that AI will cause an Armageddon (McCauley, 2007). The advantages, benefits, risks, challenges, and regulations of AI have been extensively discussed (Armstrong et al, 2016; Bernd et al, 2019; Wirtz & Muller, 2019; Mikhaylov et al, 2018; Naudé & Dimitri, 2009; Shaw et al, 2019; Vincent, 2014; Yudkowsky, 2008).…”

“…In the e-government domain, AI is considered an effective solution to many problems in the public sector, such as poor efficiency and lack of resources and experience (Toll et al, 2019). AI can increase productivity, lower costs, make products and services more widely available, and provide accuracy and precision (the United States, 2016).…”

“…With the rapid development of big data and deep learning, AI has entered a new stage in recent years (Desouza, 2018;Makridakis, 2017). In the research on AI, some scholars consider AI as a necessity for creating and maintaining a functioning society and portray AI as human beings' best hope to prevent extinction (Gurkaynak et al, 2016;Toll et al, 2019), whereas others describe it as a threat,…”