2024
DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial Intelligence in Ultrasound Diagnoses of Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Sian Mitchell,
Manolis Nikolopoulos,
Alaa El-Zarka
et al.

Abstract: Ovarian cancer is the sixth most common malignancy, with a 35% survival rate across all stages at 10 years. Ultrasound is widely used for ovarian tumour diagnosis, and accurate pre-operative diagnosis is essential for appropriate patient management. Artificial intelligence is an emerging field within gynaecology and has been shown to aid in the ultrasound diagnosis of ovarian cancers. For this study, Embase and MEDLINE databases were searched, and all original clinical studies that used artificial intelligence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These could include artificial intelligence approaches and a focus on indeterminate adnexal masses, particularly those with solid components, that are the most difficult to assess even for expert examiners or even where logistic models do not help. 6,33 On the other hand, prospective studies are needed to determine the ideal approach and which 3D vascular indices cut-offs should be used; clearly, a consensus about methodology and diagnostic criteria is needed.…”
Section: Future Research Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These could include artificial intelligence approaches and a focus on indeterminate adnexal masses, particularly those with solid components, that are the most difficult to assess even for expert examiners or even where logistic models do not help. 6,33 On the other hand, prospective studies are needed to determine the ideal approach and which 3D vascular indices cut-offs should be used; clearly, a consensus about methodology and diagnostic criteria is needed.…”
Section: Future Research Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%