2012
DOI: 10.1186/1897-4287-10-s1-a3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial neural network in predicting bladder cancer recurrence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the purpose of this paper is not to claim methodological superiority, the cautious reporting of positive results serves to demonstrate the proof of concept of the methodology for this indication. The use of MLPs has been established as a valid methodology in predicting outcomes based on genetic markers [25] and in using radiomics to identify disease [26] or to differentiate tumour subtypes [27]. These results are preliminary but contribute to a growing body of evidence demonstrating the potential for the use of deep learning to analyse radiomic data and suggest a benefit to this method in assessing for the local recurrence of lung malignancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…While the purpose of this paper is not to claim methodological superiority, the cautious reporting of positive results serves to demonstrate the proof of concept of the methodology for this indication. The use of MLPs has been established as a valid methodology in predicting outcomes based on genetic markers [25] and in using radiomics to identify disease [26] or to differentiate tumour subtypes [27]. These results are preliminary but contribute to a growing body of evidence demonstrating the potential for the use of deep learning to analyse radiomic data and suggest a benefit to this method in assessing for the local recurrence of lung malignancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The majority of the network-based methods are performed to identify distinct patterns within one cancer [ 1 , 2 ]. Compared with only analyzing one cancer, several methods have been used to identify common patterns shared by two or more cancers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%