2012
DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e318258ac11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial Neural Networks to Predict Activity Type and Energy Expenditure in Youth

Abstract: Previous studies have demonstrated that pattern recognition approaches to accelerometer data reduction are feasible and moderately accurate in classifying activity type in children. Whether pattern recognition techniques can be used to provide valid estimates of physical activity energy expenditure in youth remains unexplored in the research literature. Purpose To develop and test artificial neural networks (ANNs) to predict physical activity (PA) type and energy expenditure (PAEE) from processed acceleromete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
139
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
139
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are summarised in Table 2. In agreement with the results of Trost et al 6 recognition accuracy for the MLP was 88.4%. Recognition accuracy for the SOM and DLEN was higher than that observed for preschool children at 75.1% and 89.7%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The results are summarised in Table 2. In agreement with the results of Trost et al 6 recognition accuracy for the MLP was 88.4%. Recognition accuracy for the SOM and DLEN was higher than that observed for preschool children at 75.1% and 89.7%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As in the current study, activity trials were categorised into five activity classes; sedentary activities, light house-hold activities or games, moderate-to-vigorous games and sports, walking, and running. We hypothesised that the MLP model would provide similar recognition accuracy to that reported by Trost et al 6 and that the DLEN would provide higher recognition accuracy than the standard MLP or SOM. The results are summarised in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations