2020
DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000001148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Erosion Heat Map Shows Similar Anatomical Characteristics for Transcorporal and Standard Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 54 patients (7.5%) with cuff erosions out of a series of 723 men undergoing artificial urethral sphincter placement were evaluated by Ortiz et al (page 1027) from Dallas, Texas. 3 Erosion was observed in 18% of patients who had transcorporal cuff placement because of a prior erosion or urethral reconstruction and in 6% with standard placement. Erosions occurred predominantly in a ventral location in both groups, followed by lateral erosion.…”
Section: Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Erosion Heat Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 54 patients (7.5%) with cuff erosions out of a series of 723 men undergoing artificial urethral sphincter placement were evaluated by Ortiz et al (page 1027) from Dallas, Texas. 3 Erosion was observed in 18% of patients who had transcorporal cuff placement because of a prior erosion or urethral reconstruction and in 6% with standard placement. Erosions occurred predominantly in a ventral location in both groups, followed by lateral erosion.…”
Section: Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Erosion Heat Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of 1364 male patients who underwent an AUS implantation over the study period, 1041 patients met the inclusion criteria (figure 1). After a median follow-up of 20 months [5,54], 820 were free from revision and 221 had undergone at least one revision.…”
Section: -1 Patients' Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. did not demonstrate the protective effect of transcorporal placement compared with standard sphincter placement [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%