2013
DOI: 10.1515/forum-2013-0109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artin's conjecture and systems of diagonal equations

Abstract: Abstract. We show that Artin's conjecture concerning p-adic solubility of Diophantine equations fails for infinitely many systems of r homogeneous diagonal equations whenever r 2.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, Artin's Conjecture optimistically predicts that s>Rd2 suffices for solvability of any system (). Determining the truth of this prediction for systems over a general p‐adic field K (including double-struckQpfalse) is still an interesting and open problem (but see also 14 for some negative results).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, Artin's Conjecture optimistically predicts that s>Rd2 suffices for solvability of any system (). Determining the truth of this prediction for systems over a general p‐adic field K (including double-struckQpfalse) is still an interesting and open problem (but see also 14 for some negative results).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For larger R little is known (see [4,10,20]). It is rather remarkable that Wooley [28] very recently found examples with R = 2 where the conjecture fails, though such failures have been familiar for large R (see [19]). From the perspective taken here, our theorem adds to the small stock of examples where a conjecture of Artin's type has been verified for a class of forms of even degree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, k R ) for all but a finite set of primes. But in general, it follows from a result by Lewis and Montgomery [31,Theorem 2] that this conjecture is not true and, furthermore, Wooley [42] proved that even the case R = 2 does not hold for all tuples (k 1 , k 2 ). However, there are cases in which it does hold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%