1965
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-476-99113-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artusepik

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…155 Albon illustrates the closeness of the connection between a claim for restitution of mistaken payments under a contract and the contract itself. The principle of autonomous interpretation mandates that such claim should be regarded as falling within Article 7(1) of the Brussels I Regulation Recast because the interpretation of the contract is 'indispensable' 156 to establish the existence and extent of the defendant's restitutionary obligation. The obligation can also be regarded as a freely assumed legal incident of the contract and for that reason within Article 7(1).…”
Section: Article 7(1) and Claims For Restitution Of Mistaken Paymentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…155 Albon illustrates the closeness of the connection between a claim for restitution of mistaken payments under a contract and the contract itself. The principle of autonomous interpretation mandates that such claim should be regarded as falling within Article 7(1) of the Brussels I Regulation Recast because the interpretation of the contract is 'indispensable' 156 to establish the existence and extent of the defendant's restitutionary obligation. The obligation can also be regarded as a freely assumed legal incident of the contract and for that reason within Article 7(1).…”
Section: Article 7(1) and Claims For Restitution Of Mistaken Paymentsmentioning
confidence: 99%