The complex
[(η5-C5Me5)Ir(C2H4)(p-N2C6H4OMe)][BF4]
(1) reacts with X- = I- and
Br- to give neutral [(η5-C5Me5)IrX]2(μ-η2-p-N2C6H4OMe)(μ-η1-p-N2C6H4OMe)
where X = I (2) and Br (3), respectively.
The
spectroscopic data for 2 and 3, as well as their
15Nα derivatives 2a and
3a, establish that 2 and 3 are
isostructural
in solution and each contains diiridium centers that are bridged by two
coordinatively different aryldiazenido
ligands, i.e., μ-η2- and
μ-η1-p-N2C6H4OMe
groups. This structural feature has also been unequivocally
confirmed
in the solid state by a single-crystal X-ray crystallographic analysis
of 2. The NMR studies of the protonation
reactions of 2a and 3a indicate that protonation
occurs solely at the Nα atom of the
μ-η2-p-N2C6H4OMe
ligand
in both cases. When 1 reacts with the metal base
complex
(η5-C5Me5)Ir(CO)2
in ethanol at reflux, the monobridging
aryldiazenido complex
[{(η5-C5Me5)Ir(CO)}2(μ-η2-p-N2C6H4OMe)][BF4]
(6) results. The molecular structure of
6 in the solid state, established by a single-crystal X-ray
crystallographic analysis, is consistent with its
spectroscopic
properties in solution. On the basis of an EHMO calculation and a
fragment orbital interaction analysis, a rationale
is suggested to explain how the electronic nature of the substituent
ligand influences the outcome of substitution
reactions of 1. Complex 2 crystallized in
the space group P1̄ with a = 8.937(2)
Å, b = 10.036(2) Å, c =
10.893(2) Å, α = 79.98(1)°, β = 79.52(1)°,
γ = 70.36(1)°, and Z = 1. The structure of
2 was refined to R
F
=
0.021 and R
w
F
= 0.029
on the basis of 3077 observed independent reflections with
I
o ≥ 2.5σ(I
o) and
189 variables
in the range 2θ = 4−52°. Complex 6 crystallized
in the space group Pc21
b with
a = 8.821(1) Å, b =
20.237(2)
Å, c = 34.808(5) Å, and Z = 8.
The structure of 6 was refined to
R
F
= 0.044 and
R
w
F
= 0.049 on the
basis of
1661 observed independent reflections with I
o ≥
2.5σ(I
o) and 259 variables in the range
2θ = 4−50°.