“…At the outset we expected some correlation between the type of substituted Arylid-Box ligand used and the reaction stereoselectivity, given that both inductive and resonance effects were expected, like for instance, decreased reactivity using para-methoxy substituted Arylid-Boxs 10e and 10f due to the expected reduction in the metallocarbene intermediate electrophilicity. Such trends were not observed [3] and we postulated that this was due to slight tilting of the arylidene phenyl unit out of the plane as suggested by a density functional theory (DFT) study conducted at a B3LYP level [6] that would prevent any significant ressonace effects in such complexes. The DFT study was conducted on the Cu(I)-Arylid-Box 10b complex (for reasons of simplicity, in our model no other ligands were considered nor any counter-ions) by using the GAMESS-US [7] package with the 6-31G * basis-set for C, N, O and H and applying the Stuttgart RSC 1997 [8] effective core potential for Cu (some selected measurements appear in the caption for Fig.…”