2008
DOI: 10.3733/ca.v063n02p67
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

As carbon dioxide rises, food quality will decline without careful nitrogen management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Photorespiration has been linked to increased nitrogen uptake capacity (Rachmilevitch et al, 2004;Bloom et al, 2010Bloom et al, , 2012Bloom et al, , 2014Dellero et al, 2015;Busch et al, 2018), particularly nitrate, posing the question of whether rising CO 2 may reduce plant nitrogen uptake when nitrate is the main nitrogen source available. This is particularly relevant for crop yield, because nitrate is the dominant soil nitrogen source for most crop plants in cultivated aerated soils (Crawford & Glass, 1998;Hawkesford et al, 2012); by reducing nitrate assimilation, rising CO 2 concentrations may also threaten food quality by depleting crop protein concentrations (Bloom, 2009;Carlisle et al, 2012). Cheng et al (2012) showed that, across a range of studies, elevated CO 2 lowered nitrate uptake capacity by 16%, but had no impact on NH 4 + use.…”
Section: Rising Atmospheric Co 2 and Carbon Metabolismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photorespiration has been linked to increased nitrogen uptake capacity (Rachmilevitch et al, 2004;Bloom et al, 2010Bloom et al, , 2012Bloom et al, , 2014Dellero et al, 2015;Busch et al, 2018), particularly nitrate, posing the question of whether rising CO 2 may reduce plant nitrogen uptake when nitrate is the main nitrogen source available. This is particularly relevant for crop yield, because nitrate is the dominant soil nitrogen source for most crop plants in cultivated aerated soils (Crawford & Glass, 1998;Hawkesford et al, 2012); by reducing nitrate assimilation, rising CO 2 concentrations may also threaten food quality by depleting crop protein concentrations (Bloom, 2009;Carlisle et al, 2012). Cheng et al (2012) showed that, across a range of studies, elevated CO 2 lowered nitrate uptake capacity by 16%, but had no impact on NH 4 + use.…”
Section: Rising Atmospheric Co 2 and Carbon Metabolismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of soybean, CO 2 enrichment environments (between 550 and 700 molCO 2 mol -1 ) has shown increased photosynthesis by up to ~30% (Griffin and Luo, 1999;Rogers et al, 2004;Bernacchi et al, 2005;Prior et al, 2011), and yield by up to 13% Long et al, 2006). However, increases in photosynthetic rates can be smaller under longterm exposure to high CO 2 due to photosynthetic acclimation (Bernacchi et al 2005;Bloom, 2009). It should be noticed that higher photosynthesis does not necessarily indicate increased productivity because the yield depends ultimately on the biomass partitioning and harvest index (Richards, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If impaired nitrate reduction is a reason for declining tissue N concentrations then meeting N needs through ammonium NH 4 + could alleviate the problem. It has been suggested that ammonium-based fertilisers or the use of nitrification inhibitors (to avoid conversion of ammonia into nitrate in the soil) could be considered, provided NH 4 + toxicity and detrimental effects on soils can be managed (Bloom 2009). A recent study seems to corroborate this hypothesis because plants supplied with NH 4 + as an N source showed better responses to elevated [CO 2 ] than those supplied with NO 3 À (Carlisle et al 2012).…”
Section: Decreased Nitrate Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%