As If it Weren't Hard Enough Already: Breaking Down Hiring Discrimination Following Burnout

Abstract

Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Foundation, IZA runs the world's largest network of economists, whose research aims to provide answers to the global labor market challenges of our time. Our key objective is to build bridges between academic research, policymakers and society. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author.

El estudio de viñeta para el análisis de las contrataciones laborales: una perspectiva crítica

“…In a similar line, another major drawback concerns the possible social desirability biases involved in vignette studies (McDonald, 2019). It has been argued that this technique is more appropriate than surveys precisely to avoid such biases, as they do not inquire into sensitive topics and present a hypothetical situation in which the true purpose of the study is often masked (Sterkens et al, 2020). For this reason, vignette studies are often used to analyze attitudes.…”