2004
DOI: 10.1038/ng0904-931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

As normal as normal can be?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it is worth noting that expression levels can vary due to the presence of duplications in the genome. These duplications appear to vary between individuals and imply a diversity of loci across the genome, probably in a random manner, and resulting in copy number variations of the genes involved (Carter 2004;Iafrate et al 2004;Sebat et al 2004). A well characterized example of natural copy number variation is the gene for the CCL3-L1 chemokine that may vary in Caucasians from zero to six copies per diploid genome and which translates in a corresponding increase in the expression of this chemokine in vivo (Townson et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it is worth noting that expression levels can vary due to the presence of duplications in the genome. These duplications appear to vary between individuals and imply a diversity of loci across the genome, probably in a random manner, and resulting in copy number variations of the genes involved (Carter 2004;Iafrate et al 2004;Sebat et al 2004). A well characterized example of natural copy number variation is the gene for the CCL3-L1 chemokine that may vary in Caucasians from zero to six copies per diploid genome and which translates in a corresponding increase in the expression of this chemokine in vivo (Townson et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On average, 11 CNVs (Sebat et al 2004) or 12.4 CNVs (Iafrate et al 2004) were detected in each person with these array CGH assays. Initial commentaries (Carter 2004;Cheung 2004;Buckley et al 2005) noted the low overlap that appeared to exist between the data sets of these two studies. However, when the CNVs were mapped onto the same build of the human genome, more overlap of the two data sets could be appreciated with CNVs of larger size and frequency ( Table 2).…”
Section: Cnvs In Normal Individualsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those affecting non-coding stretches of DNA may have little or no effect, but if the duplications or deletions include genes, then the CNV is likely to have functional consequences. CNVs could potentially account for individual differences, but on the other hand, the fact they are common in the general population means that it would be dangerous to assume that a particular CNV found in an individual necessarily plays a role in their disorder [34].…”
Section: (A) Rare Variants and Copy Number Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%