Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003441.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

'As required' medication regimens for seriously mentally ill people in hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, PRN- medication was not significantly associated with on the following day’s DASA total score, implying that it did not decrease the perceived risk of violence. It has been stated that the current use of PRN- medication is based on clinical experience and habit rather than high quality evidence of real pharmacological effect [28]. The use of PRN-medication often lacks a clear chain of accountability and nurses are reluctant to increase their responsibilities for assessing the need for extra medication [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, PRN- medication was not significantly associated with on the following day’s DASA total score, implying that it did not decrease the perceived risk of violence. It has been stated that the current use of PRN- medication is based on clinical experience and habit rather than high quality evidence of real pharmacological effect [28]. The use of PRN-medication often lacks a clear chain of accountability and nurses are reluctant to increase their responsibilities for assessing the need for extra medication [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another problem is that there is a lack of scientific evidence for the effectiveness of PRN medication. There have been two systematic reviews of the subject and both of these failed to find good-quality evidence of the efficacy of PRN medication (Chakrabarti, Whicher, Morrison, & Douglas-Hall, 2007;Srivastava, 2009). Neither review identified any randomised controlled trials of PRN medication and Chakrabarti et al (2007) concluded that the current practice of making common use of PRN 'is based on clinical experience and habit rather than high quality evidence'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been two systematic reviews of the subject and both of these failed to find good-quality evidence of the efficacy of PRN medication (Chakrabarti, Whicher, Morrison, & Douglas-Hall, 2007;Srivastava, 2009). Neither review identified any randomised controlled trials of PRN medication and Chakrabarti et al (2007) concluded that the current practice of making common use of PRN 'is based on clinical experience and habit rather than high quality evidence'. In an interesting retrospective study of new admissions conducted in a US state hospital, PRN psychotropic medication orders were not permitted for a three-month experimental period (Thapa et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is limited evidence of the effectiveness of prn medication in adult psychiatric inpatients. Chakrabarti et al published a Cochrane systematic review of prn psychotropic medications in acute mental health settings [12]. They concluded that there is no evidence about the risks and benefits of prn medication regimens as compared to regular regimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%