Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/SIGDA International Symposium on Field-Programmable Gate Arrays 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3020078.3021796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also compare GenASM with ASAP [22], which is the state-of-the-art FPGA-based accelerator for computing the edit distance between two short reads. We estimate the performance of ASAP using data reported by the original work [22].…”
Section: Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We also compare GenASM with ASAP [22], which is the state-of-the-art FPGA-based accelerator for computing the edit distance between two short reads. We estimate the performance of ASAP using data reported by the original work [22].…”
Section: Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also compare GenASM with ASAP [22], the state-ofthe-art FPGA-based accelerator for edit distance calculation. While we are unable to reimplement ASAP, the execution time and power consumption analysis of ASAP provided in [22] allows us to provide a comparison between GenASM and ASAP. ASAP is optimized for shorter sequences and reports execution time only for sequences of length 64bp-320bp [22].…”
Section: Use Case 3: Edit Distance Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations