2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-87240-3_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ASC-Net: Adversarial-Based Selective Network for Unsupervised Anomaly Segmentation

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the lack of added representational capacity upon adding new layers raises some further questions regarding what are optimal architectures for hierarchical GPs, what inductive biases do they need or how to properly initialize them to facilitate adequate training. Additionally, our comparison with respect to reconstruction based approaches towards OOD detection was not complete as it did not include a comprehensive list of recent models (Dey and Hong, 2021;Pinaya et al, 2021;Schlegl et al, 2019;Baur et al, 2018). However, comparing our proposed model with reconstruction based approaches was not our intended goal for this paper, the main aim being to compare with models which can provide accurate predictive results alongside OOD detection capabilities at the same time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the lack of added representational capacity upon adding new layers raises some further questions regarding what are optimal architectures for hierarchical GPs, what inductive biases do they need or how to properly initialize them to facilitate adequate training. Additionally, our comparison with respect to reconstruction based approaches towards OOD detection was not complete as it did not include a comprehensive list of recent models (Dey and Hong, 2021;Pinaya et al, 2021;Schlegl et al, 2019;Baur et al, 2018). However, comparing our proposed model with reconstruction based approaches was not our intended goal for this paper, the main aim being to compare with models which can provide accurate predictive results alongside OOD detection capabilities at the same time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the lack of added representational capacity upon adding new layers raises some further questions regarding what are optimal architectures for hierarchical GPs, what inductive biases do they need or how to properly initialize them to facilitate adequate training. Additionally, our comparison with respect to reconstruction based approaches towards OOD detection was not complete as it did not include a comprehensive list of recent models (Dey and Hong, 2021;Pinaya et al, 2021;Schlegl et al, 2019;Baur et al, 2018). However, comparing our proposed model with reconstruction based approaches was not our intended goal for this paper, the main aim being to compare with models which can provide accurate predictive results alongside OOD detection capabilities at the same time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sliced-based techniques [20], [21] extract slices from the 3D neuroimaging brain scan by projecting the sagittal, coronal, and axial to the 2D image slices. Indeed, because non-affected regions and normal slices must be chosen as the reference distribution, they cannot account for the disease and may be considered an anomaly [22]. Furthermore, choosing separate 2D slices may neglect the spatial dependencies of voxels in adjacent slices due to inter/intra anatomical variances in the brain images [14].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%