Asedio compasivo: los vericuetos del cuidar

Casado, Maria; Buxó, Mª Jesús

doi:10.4321/s1886-58872013000200002

Cited by 9 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…With regard to competence, the aim is to verify whether individuals are able to make full use of their mental faculties, understanding the medical care being proposed and acting autonomously. For Professor Maria Casado, this assessment relates to patients' capacity to understand the relevant information about their health condition, communicated in an appropriate and understandable way by the physician; to understand the consequences arising from each decision; to reason based on the information provided and their own values; and to communicate their decision clearly and repeatedly 18 .…”

Section: Autonomy To Decide On Medical Carementioning

confidence: 99%

Discharge against medical advice: what to do, doctor?

Cerqueira

Oliveira

2023

Rev. Bioét.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper examines the procedures recommended by Brazilian medical councils regarding “discharge against medical advice”. An exploratory and documentary research was conducted to identify and analyze several council publications regarding questions and doubts raised by physicians when faced with discharge requests. Solutions proposed to the issue at hand (ethical-legal insecurity of physicians in authorizing discharges) were analyzed based on ethical-legal frameworks, aiming to provide physicians with greater security and tranquility in conducting this procedure.

show abstract

Section: Autonomy To Decide On Medical Carementioning

confidence: 99%

Discharge against medical advice: what to do, doctor?

Cerqueira

Oliveira

2023

Rev. Bioét.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Despite the fact that bioethics arose with a generic approach, its subsequent development gradually became more closely aligned with medical ethics, focusing on the doctor-patient relationship and the sphere of biomedical research. Nevertheless, the continuous expansion of its horizon, with social, political and legal implications, among others, means that in general there is a growing trend to speak of ethics as such [ 23 ]. Even the first institute with the name of bioethics, the Kennedy Institute, changed its name and is today called “The Kennedy Institute of Ethics”.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In clinical ethics committees, problems are deliberated and discussed in an institutionalised interdisciplinary debate, with the health professionals who have the specific technical knowledge of their medical specialisation, with legal advisers, with social workers, with patients’ representatives, and with experts in ethics. This is done by weighing the principles (fundamental values), appraising the actions at hand in proportion to the available resources (if it should be done, it can be done), avoiding the consequences that are undesirable, and fostering those that are desirable, which are so by virtue of their being in accordance with the values whereby we, as a society, wish to be characterised [ 23 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards public health ethics

Royo-Bordonada

Román-Maestre

2015

Public Health Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Health is a value, both objective and subjective, yet it is not the only value that contributes to the well-being of persons. In public health, there are different connotations of the term “public” relevant from an ethical perspective: population, government action, and collective action of the community. Ethics seeks to provide a basis for and justify moral decisions and actions. Ethics asks, why should I do it?, and the reply consists of an argument. The type of ethics that underpins applied ethics in general, and bioethics in particular, is civic ethics, a philosophical reflection on the criteria that enable the peaceful coexistence of citizens with different morals. Progress means emancipation as well as an increase of autonomy. However, more is not always better, and now we know that no health intervention, including a public health intervention, is risk-free. The false belief that undergoing a prevention intervention is always better than doing nothing explains, at least in part, that in contrast to bioethics, only recently have the ethical implications in public health practice been given the attention they deserve. Positive externalities in third parties, such as in vaccination programmes or policies to prevent harm to passive smokers, can occasionally justify the potential risks of a public health intervention. It is in such situations where a conflict might arise between the goal of improving the health of the population and the respect for the rights and freedoms of the individual that characterizes the dilemmas in public health ethics. In conclusion, it is necessary to have a public health ethics framework and a professional code of ethics applied to public health. The training of public health professionals in ethics is essential to ensure that they feel more confident when it comes to addressing the sheer range of ethical conflicts that they frequently face in the performance of their duties.

show abstract

“…Os estudos apresentam um mosaico de problemas que podem ser debatidos a partir Conselho da Europa, que está baseado nos princípios da liberdade, igualdade e seguridade e no respeito mútuo das opiniões diferentes e trata de ser o complemento às grandes declarações de direitos. 10,11,12 Sobre o tema, podemos acompanhar a discussão existente no campo da saúde pública com relação a formação da Saúde Coletiva como núcleo de saberes e práticas. Até desenvolver-se como tal, muito se questionou sobre sua formação e enrijecimento de suas práticas, uma vez que a Saúde Coletiva era exercida por inúmeras áreas do conhecimento e não especificamente detentora de uma única área.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Bioética como núcleo de saberes e práticas: contribuições à formação de bioeticista

Neto¹

2014

Rev. SORBI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: Taking into consideration the traditional understanding of bioethics as a non-pecific multidisciplinary field of research and training activities; and considering the development fostered by bioethics over the past decades, especially in comparison to other areas fostered by knowledge in the same period, and in particular of Public Health, this paper seeks to question how bioethics still persists as a field against . In other words, this paper seeks, in general, Rev. SORBI, 2014; 2(1), 24-34. www.sorbi.org.br/revista ISSN: 2318-9983 Revista da SORBI, 2014; 2(1), p. 24-34.

show abstract

Asedio compasivo: los vericuetos del cuidar

Cited by 9 publications

References 7 publications

Discharge against medical advice: what to do, doctor?

Discharge against medical advice: what to do, doctor?

Towards public health ethics

Bioética como núcleo de saberes e práticas: contribuições à formação de bioeticista

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About