2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aseptic loosening of the patellar component at the cement–implant interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Daily range of movement of the knee results in shearing coronal forces as well as compressive sagittal forces across the patellofemoral joint (PFJ). The magnitude of the joint reaction force (JRF) increases as the knee flexes to maintain equilibrium against rising quadriceps force and patella tension [7,8]. The JRF during flexion increases fourfold compared to during extension [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Daily range of movement of the knee results in shearing coronal forces as well as compressive sagittal forces across the patellofemoral joint (PFJ). The magnitude of the joint reaction force (JRF) increases as the knee flexes to maintain equilibrium against rising quadriceps force and patella tension [7,8]. The JRF during flexion increases fourfold compared to during extension [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a lateral shear force acting on the patella button between 0° to 50°; this shear force changes its direction to the medial side as the knee flexes from 55° to 90° [10]. These changes in the direction of the articular shear force result in a cyclic rocking effect on the cement peg interface in a medial-lateral fashion [8]. These forces and the changes that occur during extension and flexion are transmitted to the cement implant interface both in the coronal and sagittal planes, causing patella component loosening [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even after the component had loosened, the patient reported none of the complaints that are common in this situation, such as pain or restriction of knee movements. 6 The event was only noticed when transcutaneous extrusion of the component occurred. The patient only presented because it was time for his annual routine post-arthroplasty consultation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The loosened patellar component most commonly migrates to the intra-articular region of the knee. 6 However, there have been a few reports of migration of the component to the extraarticular region, 7,8 particularly when release of the lateral retinaculum and osteonecrosis of the patella are involved. 9 The authors report a case of patellar component loosening and extra-articular and transcutaneous migration of the component 9 years after TKA.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With increased concern about aseptic loosening, tension, and osteolysis at the bone–cement interface for cemented components, these studies suggest that uncemented patellar designs could provide a reasonable alternative. 115 , 117 , 118 However, Chan et al reported a minimum 20% rate of component fracture at an average of 5.4 years following cementless TKA, and thus the authors recommended continued monitoring and investigation of cementless patellar designs. 119 …”
Section: Patella Resurfacing Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%