Aseptic loosening of tumor prostheses in distal femur after revision surgery: a retrospective study

Abstract

Background Tumor prostheses of the distal femur after revision surgery is associated with high rates of aseptic loosening, which has introduced great challenges to the survival of patients, but only a few studies have evaluated their X-ray imaging. The purpose of this study was to analyze the risk factors for recurrence of aseptic loosening and make recommendations to reduce the incidence of aseptic loosening after revision surgery of tumor prostheses in the distal femur. Method A retrospective analysis was performed on 23 patients who had revision surgery for distal femur prostheses due to aseptic loosening between June 2002 and June 2021. They were divided into two groups based on the condition of the prostheses after revision surgery: loosening group (9 patients) and control group (14 patients). Following the initial replacement, the length and diameter of the prosthetic intramedullary stem were measured through the standard full-length anteroposterior X-ray imaging of both lower limbs. The osteotomy length, femoral length and diameter, femoral intramedullary stem diameter, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), and so on were measured as well. Following that, statistical analysis was performed. Results Patients in the loosening group had statistically significant differences in the ratio of prostheses length to femur length (71.89 ± 6.62) and the ratio of intramedullary stem diameter to femoral diameter (25.50 ± 6.90) (P < 0.05), when compared to the control group. The HKAA (175.58 ± 2.78), mLDFA (94.42 ± 2.57), and the deviation angle between the lower limb alignment and the tibial prostheses force line (2.23 ± 1.09) in the loosening group were significantly different from those in the control group (P < 0.05) on postoperative radiographs of the entire length of the lower limbs. The lowest score in intramedullary manubrium I indicated less osteolysis, while the highest score in intramedullary manubrium III indicated the most serious osteolysis, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusions Our study suggests that the use of longer and thicker intramedullary stems can effectively decrease the occurrence of aseptic loosening. Additionally, it is important to avoid using the original prostheses and reconstruct the standard line of lower limb force to further reduce the incidence of aseptic loosening. It is crucial to closely monitor the distal segment of the intramedullary stem for osteolysis after surgery.

Limited Revision with a Newly Designed Hinge Device for the Treatment of Mega‐Prosthesis Hinge Failure: Two Case Reports

“…However, in China, some patients have accepted old mega‐prosthesis reconstruction without any axial yoke‐type hinge. 8 Some of these patients experienced clinical problems such as knee hyperextension, dislocation, and joint instability. These complications are not only present in a certain type of mega‐prosthesis, but also may be encountered by all mega‐prostheses.…”

“… 7 A conventional revision surgery generally involves removing the failed mega‐prostheses thoroughly and then installing new mega‐prostheses. 8 , 9 , 10 This revision method in most cases is often traumatic, difficult to operate, and less cost‐effective. 7 , 11 , 12 If old prostheses with design defects requiring revision can be corrected through partial component replacement, the treatment goal can be achieved.…”