1992
DOI: 10.1093/0195076036.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asia's Next Giant

Abstract: South Korea has been quietly growing into a major economic force that is even challenging some Japanese industries. This book examines South Korean economic growth as an example of “late industrialization,” a process in which a nation's industries learn from earlier innovator nations rather than innovate themselves. Discussing state intervention, shop‐floor management, and big business groups, the reasons are explored for South Korea's phenomenal growth, paying special attention to the principle of reciprocity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
211
0
20

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 678 publications
(233 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
211
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this view, market forces should determine where and how technology is produced and used, and government should limit its role to provision of public goods and mitigating market failures (although there is significant variation in the definition of what fits into these categories). Other analysts (Amsden, 1989;Wade, 1990;Ernst & O'Connor, 1992) point out that the private sector tends to chronically under invest in high-cost, high-risk technological innovations that have relatively long payback periods. Under such circumstances, it is argued that government must act to support technological development, either through its own research activities, or through subsidies to the private sector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this view, market forces should determine where and how technology is produced and used, and government should limit its role to provision of public goods and mitigating market failures (although there is significant variation in the definition of what fits into these categories). Other analysts (Amsden, 1989;Wade, 1990;Ernst & O'Connor, 1992) point out that the private sector tends to chronically under invest in high-cost, high-risk technological innovations that have relatively long payback periods. Under such circumstances, it is argued that government must act to support technological development, either through its own research activities, or through subsidies to the private sector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "developmental state" literature explored the role of the state in industrial development, especially in the countries that industrialized late like, for example, Japan or South Korea (Johnson 1982;Amsden 1985Amsden , 1989Cumings 1999;WooCumings 1999). Approaches to measuring institutional quality vary.…”
Section: Institutions and Inventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the governments' pro-liberalisation policies towards foreign investors in the mid-1980s it reached only 9.7%. (Amsden, 1989:92) The country's attitude towards foreign investors in the 1960s was designed on the basis of a very sophisticated notion of costs and benefits, with invitations to MNEs and foreign investors only approved after potential benefits were recognised. The government's 1981 White Papers on Foreign Investment lists that such investments should positively contribute towards industrial upgrading, technology transfer, job creation and balance of payments.…”
Section: Importance Of Foreign Capital: a Historical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The government's 1981 White Papers on Foreign Investment lists that such investments should positively contribute towards industrial upgrading, technology transfer, job creation and balance of payments. (Amsden, 1989) There were policies that restricted areas where MNEs could enter. In the early 1980s, nearly 50% of all industries and 20% of manufacturing industries were still 'off-limits' to foreign investors.…”
Section: Importance Of Foreign Capital: a Historical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation