1998
DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199807001-00383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asian Pacific American Seafood Consumption Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the survey, 77 respondents were asked using questionnaire to choose one of several descriptors as listed in Table III to know the probabilities of consumption frequency and shrimp number per serving as well as part(s) to be consumed. The probability of the number of shrimp consumers in this study was 0.94 (Table III) and this value was comparable to 0.98reported for Asian and Pacific Islander [12].Five from a total of 77 participants(P = 0.06) in this study did not consume shrimps as they are vegetarians or allergic to shrimps. In this study, the probabilities to consume shrimp muscle only and whole body were 0.63 and 0.11 (Table III) and were relatively comparable to those reported in [12] as 0.78 and 0.21, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the survey, 77 respondents were asked using questionnaire to choose one of several descriptors as listed in Table III to know the probabilities of consumption frequency and shrimp number per serving as well as part(s) to be consumed. The probability of the number of shrimp consumers in this study was 0.94 (Table III) and this value was comparable to 0.98reported for Asian and Pacific Islander [12].Five from a total of 77 participants(P = 0.06) in this study did not consume shrimps as they are vegetarians or allergic to shrimps. In this study, the probabilities to consume shrimp muscle only and whole body were 0.63 and 0.11 (Table III) and were relatively comparable to those reported in [12] as 0.78 and 0.21, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The probability of the number of shrimp consumers in this study was 0.94 (Table III) and this value was comparable to 0.98reported for Asian and Pacific Islander [12].Five from a total of 77 participants(P = 0.06) in this study did not consume shrimps as they are vegetarians or allergic to shrimps. In this study, the probabilities to consume shrimp muscle only and whole body were 0.63 and 0.11 (Table III) and were relatively comparable to those reported in [12] as 0.78 and 0.21, respectively. This study found that a probability to consume muscle and some parts of carapace was 0.26 (Table III).The weighted-average of consumption frequency is calculated as (3) where P i is the probability that a certain CF will occur and F i is the number of consumption frequency per month (1, 2, 3, or 4).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Sechena et al (1999) reported high levels of consumption amongst ethnic Asian groups in the US of heads, roe, bones and organs. Therefore, there are potentially large amounts of seafood that are not processed in Asia and the by-product is neither available from the 83 processor or at the household level.…”
Section: Processing and Utilisation Of Fishery Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trend in urbanisation and fish consumption is likely to continue but how this affects the demand for processed fish products is debatable, as shown by ethnic Asian populations in the USA which still preferred to buy whole fish and consume much of what is often considered as byproducts in developed nations (Sechena et al 1999). According to Chiu et al (2013) almost all carp and tilapia consumed in Shandong, Zhejiang and Hainan provinces in China were purchased as live fish, although there was a small trend towards buying processed tilapia.…”
Section: Projected Fishmeal Supplies To 2030mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 The state came to an agreement with the tribes and the EPA to use a 175-g/day fish consumption rate, which protects up to the 95th percentile of Oregonians who consume the most fish, according to research conducted by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, the EPA, and tribal biologists. 35,36,37,38,39 The revised human health criteria were approved by the Oregon…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%