2021
DOI: 10.1177/02692163211042530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asian patients’ perspectives on advance care planning: A mixed-method systematic review and conceptual framework

Abstract: Background: Asian healthcare professionals hold that patients’ families play an essential role in advance care planning. Aim: To systematically synthesize evidence regarding Asian patients’ perspectives on advance care planning and their underlying motives. Design: Mixed-method systematic review and the development of a conceptual framework (PROSPERO: CRD42018099980). Data sources: EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for studies published until July 27, 2020. We included studies c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before starting these discussions, we developed a topic guide based on our systematic reviews of advance care planning in Asia [ 5 , 6 ] and on consultation of various experts on palliative and cancer care, with backgrounds in medical oncology, palliative care, research, and psychology. The focus-group topic guide (Appendix 1 ) addressed: (1) an introduction to the study; (2) participants’ prior knowledge of advance care planning; (3) participants’ perspectives on advance care planning; (4) whether and how advance care planning was practiced at participants’ current workplace, and their ideas about it; and (5) barriers and facilitators for advance care planning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before starting these discussions, we developed a topic guide based on our systematic reviews of advance care planning in Asia [ 5 , 6 ] and on consultation of various experts on palliative and cancer care, with backgrounds in medical oncology, palliative care, research, and psychology. The focus-group topic guide (Appendix 1 ) addressed: (1) an introduction to the study; (2) participants’ prior knowledge of advance care planning; (3) participants’ perspectives on advance care planning; (4) whether and how advance care planning was practiced at participants’ current workplace, and their ideas about it; and (5) barriers and facilitators for advance care planning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study conducted by Ma [45] reported that 35.4% of Taiwanese patients were still receiving dialysis prior to death, 12.2% received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and 58.9% signed the DNR orders by family members 24h prior to their death. Similarly, a systematic review of ACP in Asia (n = 36) found that 32-88% of Asian (Hong Kong, 34-88%; China 32-80%; South Korea 59%) patients perceived the benefits of ACP [46,47], and yet, the AD completion rate among the general population is merely 0.5% in Hong Kong [47], 10% among Chinese Americans [48]. The low initiation of ACP might be due to the role of Confucianism in Chinese culture, which prioritizes family-centred decision making [49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to previous studies examining perspectives regarding advances care planning in general (36,37) and advance directives in particular (38), all participants lacked a clear understanding of the concepts. They tended to conflate advance directives with people's last will or testament, and those in the veteran Jewish and Arab groups even equated them with euthanasia.…”
Section: Understanding Dementia-related Advance Directivesmentioning
confidence: 93%