2020
DOI: 10.1080/13569775.2020.1712005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asian women’s paths to office: a qualitative comparative analysis approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jahan 1987;Richter 1990;Fleschenberg 2008;Derichs & Thompson 2013). Today, however, pathways to parliament in Asia include not only the elite route (political insiders; surrogates for male relatives) but also the grassroots (experience in activism; solving social and political community issues) and middle pathways (working professionals; women choosing politics as a vocation) (Choi 2019; see also Inguanzo 2020;Och & Joshi 2021). Moreover, in some Asian countries, feminist activists have on occasion been able to get a foothold in politics (see Edwards & Roces 2010).…”
Section: The Asian Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jahan 1987;Richter 1990;Fleschenberg 2008;Derichs & Thompson 2013). Today, however, pathways to parliament in Asia include not only the elite route (political insiders; surrogates for male relatives) but also the grassroots (experience in activism; solving social and political community issues) and middle pathways (working professionals; women choosing politics as a vocation) (Choi 2019; see also Inguanzo 2020;Och & Joshi 2021). Moreover, in some Asian countries, feminist activists have on occasion been able to get a foothold in politics (see Edwards & Roces 2010).…”
Section: The Asian Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many women leaders are part of the social, economic, and political elite. Among all the women who became presidents or prime ministers between 1960 and 2019, 17 (27%) were wives, daughters, or sisters of male political leaders who held high office (Paxton, Hughes, and Barnes 2021, 61–63), even though the importance of family ties to women’s elections has decreased in Asia (Inguanzo 2020). Dynastic politicians, who are from “any family that has supplied two or more members to the national-level political office” (Smith 2018, 4), exist in various types of modern democracies.…”
Section: Family Ties Dynastic Politics and The Question Of “Which Wom...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such studies highlight in what ways women's civic activism and participation in formal politics can also be strategically used by such regimes, for example, as legitimation strategies or to gain voter support, or to allow the certain provision of women's rights as an illusion of democratic practice while covering up other violations or repression, for example, human rights (Lorch and Bunk, 2016;Valdini, 2019;Bjarnegård and Zetterberg, 2022). Yet, women's experiences of parliament as a gendered institution and particularly how informal obstacles influence their political power remains understudied in hybrid regime contexts (Inguanzo, 2020;Højlund Madsen, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although women increasingly enter and influence political institutions, such as parliaments, around the world, various formal barriers-for example, socio-economic factors or political recruitment-continue to impact women's experiences of participation in parliaments and other political institutions (Paxton and Hughes, 2015;Inguanzo, 2020). Even once women have entered political decision-making arenas, for example as political leaders or in cabinet positions, gendered barriers continue to persist (Heath et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%