2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2016.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asians compared to Whites show increased response to d-amphetamine on select subjective and cardiovascular measures

Abstract: Objective Identifying factors that moderate subjective response to stimulants is important for understanding individuals at risk for abusing these drugs. Some research suggests that Asians may respond differently to stimulants than other races, but controlled human laboratory research of stimulant administration effects in Asians is scant Methods In this double-blind counterbalanced within-subject study, healthy stimulant-naïve participants (N = 65; 55% Asian; 63% female; age 18–35) received a single dose of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study used a within-subjects design, in which participants attended a baseline session, followed by two four-hour experimental sessions at which a 20 mg dose of oral d -amphetamine or placebo was administered under double-blind conditions (session order was counterbalanced). The present findings are a secondary analysis of a larger study examining individual difference factors that predict response to the acute effects of d -amphetamine (Kirkpatrick et al, 2016; Leventhal et al, 2017; Pang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study used a within-subjects design, in which participants attended a baseline session, followed by two four-hour experimental sessions at which a 20 mg dose of oral d -amphetamine or placebo was administered under double-blind conditions (session order was counterbalanced). The present findings are a secondary analysis of a larger study examining individual difference factors that predict response to the acute effects of d -amphetamine (Kirkpatrick et al, 2016; Leventhal et al, 2017; Pang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 20 mg d-amphetamine dose was selected based on previous studies indicating differences in acute d-amphetamine response as a function of trait personality measures (Kirkpatrick et al, 2013;White et al, 2006). This dose produces reliable subjective effects in naïve participants (see time course graphs in Leventhal et al, 2017 andPang et al, 2016), without increasing adverse effects associated with larger doses.…”
Section: Drugmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, majority of the study participants were Caucasians, with a smaller number of African-Americans or Hispanics. There is evidence that Asians may be more susceptible to the cardiovascular and euphoric effects of damphetamines, 43 and this could have been missed in the studies reviewed. Thus, research in this field involving more diverse sample will be desirable.…”
Section: Implications For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%