2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2022.108566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ASMFS: Adaptive-similarity-based multi-modality feature selection for classification of Alzheimer's disease

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) t-test, multi-kernel with t-test; (4) Lasso, multi-kernel with Lasso; (5) Multi-task multi-modality feature selection (M3L) [28], multi-kernel with multi-task; (6) Manifold regularized multi-task multi-modality feature selection (M2TFS) [14], multi-kernel with manifold regularization and multitask; (7) Hypergraph based multi-task multi-modality feature selection (HMTFS) [36], multikernel with hypergraph-based regularization and multi-task; (8) Discriminative multi-task multimodality feature selection (DMTFS) [37]: multi-kernel with discriminative regularization term and multi-task; (9) Clustered multi-task multi-modality feature selection (CMTFS) [38]: multi-kernel with a new spectral norm and multi-task; (10) Adaptive-similarity-based multi-modality feature selection (ASMFS) [39]: multi-kernel with a similarity matrix learned from different modalities and multi-task. The regularization parameters of Lasso, M3L, M2TFS, HMTFS, DMTFS, CMTFS and ASMFS were selected from [1e -5 , 1e -4 , 1e -3 , 1e -2 , 1e -1 ], the parameter for discriminative regularization term in DMTFS and the number of neighbors in ASMFS were chosen from [0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4] and Each domain was alternatively used as the target domain, while the remaining domains were regarded as source domains.…”
Section: Comparison With 10 Multi-modality Feature Selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) t-test, multi-kernel with t-test; (4) Lasso, multi-kernel with Lasso; (5) Multi-task multi-modality feature selection (M3L) [28], multi-kernel with multi-task; (6) Manifold regularized multi-task multi-modality feature selection (M2TFS) [14], multi-kernel with manifold regularization and multitask; (7) Hypergraph based multi-task multi-modality feature selection (HMTFS) [36], multikernel with hypergraph-based regularization and multi-task; (8) Discriminative multi-task multimodality feature selection (DMTFS) [37]: multi-kernel with discriminative regularization term and multi-task; (9) Clustered multi-task multi-modality feature selection (CMTFS) [38]: multi-kernel with a new spectral norm and multi-task; (10) Adaptive-similarity-based multi-modality feature selection (ASMFS) [39]: multi-kernel with a similarity matrix learned from different modalities and multi-task. The regularization parameters of Lasso, M3L, M2TFS, HMTFS, DMTFS, CMTFS and ASMFS were selected from [1e -5 , 1e -4 , 1e -3 , 1e -2 , 1e -1 ], the parameter for discriminative regularization term in DMTFS and the number of neighbors in ASMFS were chosen from [0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4] and Each domain was alternatively used as the target domain, while the remaining domains were regarded as source domains.…”
Section: Comparison With 10 Multi-modality Feature Selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the curse of dimensionality limits current methods; too few subjects are available for training compared with large features. Furthermore, feature vectors of high dimension generally contain redundant or irrelevant information, which can lead to overfitting and reduced generalizability of the algorithm (Shi et al 2022 ). The dataset is an important factor directly influencing machine learning performance(Turkoglu et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al 18 used a locality adaptive strategy for multi-modality fusion to generate high-quality PET images. Shi et al 19 proposed a method called Adaptive-Similarity-based Multi-modality Feature Selection (ASMFS) which improves the performance of multimodality feature selection. Recent years of multi-modal end-to-end AD recognition approaches [20][21][22][23][24] have shown that the complement of images from different device sources of Alzheimer's patients can improve the possibility of disease recognition performance.…”
Section: Multi-modality Alzheimer's Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%