2007
DOI: 10.5575/geosoc.113.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aso-4火砕流堆積物中の花崗岩マイロナイト異質礫の岩石学と放射年代および荷尾杵花崗岩との対比

Abstract: Aso-pyroclastic flow is one of the largest volcanic activities in Japan and formed huge caldera of the Aso volcano at about , years b.p.. This pyroclastic flow brought about accidental clasts of granitic mylonite in the Aso-pyroclastic deposit in northern area of the caldera. These granitic mylonite clasts were investigated petrologically and geochronologically, and compared with the Nioki Granite in the Asaji area to the east of the volcano. The Aso-granitic clasts are characterized by garnet-muscovite bearin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Hinagu–Futagawa fault zone is the western extension of the Median Tectonic Line (e.g., Kamata and Kodama 1994 ; Takagi et al 2007 ; Matsumoto et al 2015 ), which is composed of the NNE-SSW- to NE-SW-striking Hinagu Fault and NE-SW- to ENE-WSW-striking Futagawa Fault, and extends for ∼81 km in the central Kyushu Island (Fig. 1 ).…”
Section: Tectonic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hinagu–Futagawa fault zone is the western extension of the Median Tectonic Line (e.g., Kamata and Kodama 1994 ; Takagi et al 2007 ; Matsumoto et al 2015 ), which is composed of the NNE-SSW- to NE-SW-striking Hinagu Fault and NE-SW- to ENE-WSW-striking Futagawa Fault, and extends for ∼81 km in the central Kyushu Island (Fig. 1 ).…”
Section: Tectonic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published age dates of the granitic rocks using various methods (K-Ar, Rb-Sr, Sm-Nd, CHIME, U-Pb) on whole rock and minerals range from 143 to 75 Ma, whereas the mafic rocks yielded ages (K-Ar, Rb-Sr, U-Pb) that are comparatively more restricted and were emplaced from 123 to 97 Ma (Hattori and Shibata, 1982;Sasada, 1987;Osanai et al, 1993;Nakajima et al, 1995;Kamei et al, 1997Kamei et al, , 2000Kamei et al, , 2004Matsuura, 1998;Hamamoto et al, 1999;Owada et al, 1999;Takagi et al, 2000Takagi et al, , 2007Sakashima et al, 2003;Nishimura et al, 2004;Fujii et al, 2008;Kouchi et al, 2011;Miyoshi et al, 2011;Adachi et al, 2012;Tiepolo et al, 2012;Miyazaki et al, 2018). In comparison, the dacite and andesite yielded K-Ar mineral ages of 107 ± 3 Ma (Imaoka et al, 1993) and from 110 to 102 Ma (Imaoka et al, 1993;Matsuura, 1998;Owada et al, 1999), respectively.…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abbreviations for stratigraphy: Coniac., Coniacian; Sant., Santonian. References for radiometric age data: [1] Aoki et al (), [2] Imaoka, Nakajima, and Itaya (), [3] Takagi et al (), [4] Takagi et al (), [5] Takagi, Soda, and Yoshimura (), [6] Kishi et al (), [7] Imaoka et al (), [8] Imaoka and Ikawa (), [9] Imaoka et al (), [10] Yuge, Imaoka, and Iizumi (), [11] Ikawa et al (), [12] Suzuki, Adachi, and Nureki (), [13] Suzuki and Adachi (), [14] Suzuki, Adachi, and Kajizuka (), [15] Umeda et al (), [16] Tazaki et al (), [17] Kagami et al (), [18] T. Sato et al (), [19] Aoki et al (), [20] Nakahata, Isozaki, and Tsutsumi (), [21] Sonehara and Yagi (), [22] Matsumoto, Sawada, and Kagami (), [23] K. Sato et al (), [24] A. Noda et al (), [25] A. Noda, Danhara, Iwano, and Hirata (2017a), [26] Nakajima et al (), [27] Iida et al (), [28] D. Sato, Matsuura, and Yamamoto (2016a), [29] D. Sato, Yamamoto, and Takagi (2016b), [30] D. Sato (), [31] Terakado and Nohda (), [32] D. Sato (), [33] H. Ito et al (), [34] Miyata (), [35] Shibata and Uchiumi (), [36] Seike et al (), [37] Morioka, Tainosho, and Kagami (), [38] Watanabe et al (), [39] Kawakami and Suzuki (). Detailed version of this figure is presented in supporting information…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%