2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2008.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspartic acid racemization variability in ancient human remains: implications in the prediction of ancient DNA recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the preservation of both amino acids and proteins and aDNA is highly plausible in the prehistoric remains recovered from hot, dry environments, AAR cannot inform the plausibility that the aDNA in our samples is authentic. Moreover, neither of two recent critical evaluations of AAR have found it useful as a means of assessing aDNA preservation in bones and teeth (Collins et al 2009;Fernandez et al 2009). Because cloning identifies only the majority consensus sequence, which itself can be a contaminant, it provides no confidence in the authenticity of aDNA samples unless a target sequence is unknown (e.g., as in the case of Neanderthal mtDNA sequences).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the preservation of both amino acids and proteins and aDNA is highly plausible in the prehistoric remains recovered from hot, dry environments, AAR cannot inform the plausibility that the aDNA in our samples is authentic. Moreover, neither of two recent critical evaluations of AAR have found it useful as a means of assessing aDNA preservation in bones and teeth (Collins et al 2009;Fernandez et al 2009). Because cloning identifies only the majority consensus sequence, which itself can be a contaminant, it provides no confidence in the authenticity of aDNA samples unless a target sequence is unknown (e.g., as in the case of Neanderthal mtDNA sequences).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The early development of this field in archaeology and palaeontology had a strong influence on the initial criteria that emerged regarding the precautions required for the production of verifiable data based on aDNA [16,17]. These have since been modified [18] to take account of our increased understanding of the sources of contamination [19] and the stability of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) aDNA [20] as compared with other biomolecules [21,22].…”
Section: Early Biomolecular Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagenetic alteration of protein structure may lead to cross-reactions and false identifications (Tuross et al, 1996). Aspartic (Asp) acid racemization ratios have generally been used to assess the potential for aDNA and protein preservation in an archaeological assemblage (Poinar et al, 1996; for a critique on the usage of racemization to assess aDNA preservation see Ferná ndez et al, 2009). Ratio values over 0.1 are interpreted as reflecting samples that have been subjected to diagenetic processes and likely will not produce well-preserved proteins.…”
Section: Pria Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%