“…Highly significant correlation (p < 0.01) between body mass, age and other testicular parameters agreed with Murrah buffalo bulls (LUZ, SANTOS, ANDRIGHETTO et al, 2013) and contrasted to the correlation described only between the testis mass and the length, width and tubule diameter in collared peccary (GUIMARÃES, CARDOSO, FERREIRA et al, 2013) and between testicular mass and length and between testicular mass and width (FRANÇA, SILVA-JUNIOR, CHIARINI-GARCIA et al, 2000;FERREIRA, GUIMARÃES, LUZ-RAMOS et al, 2004;SONNER, MIGLINO, SANTOS et al, 2004;OHASHI, MIRANDA, CORDEIRO et al, 2007). Thus, highly significant correlation (p < 0.01) between age, body mass and testicular biometric data indicated that, in guinea pigs, testicular development depended both on age and body development, as in other rodent species (ASSIS NETO, CARVALHO, MELO et al, 2003a;FERREIRA, GUIMARÃES, LUZ-RAMOS et al, 2004), in opposition to other mammal species, in which testicular development rather depends on body development (COUROT, HOCHEREAUA-DE REVIERS and ORTAVANT, 1970) or those with gradual loss in the correlations between testicular measurements and body mass in the adult phase (SOUZA, ARAÚJO, OLIVEIRA et al, 2010). GSI in guinea pigs was within the range regarded as normal for rodents, 0.10% to 8.00% (KENAGY and TROMBULAK, 1986), and the value observed in the phase postpuberal 2 (0.44%) was inferior to that observed in Swiss mice, 0.69% (MORAIS, BARBOSA, NEVES et al, 2009), and chinchillas, 0.80% (LEAL and FRANÇA, 2008), and superior to those observed in pacas, 0.22%, agoutis, 0.33% (COSTA, LEAL, FERREIRA et al, 2013), and capybaras (0.14% in MOREIRA, CLARKE and MACDONALD, 1997;0.12% in PAULA, COSTA and MATTA, 2002).…”