Aspects of acoustic emission attenuation in steel pipes subject to different internal and external environments

Abstract

The current paper follows from earlier work on the propagation of acoustic emission (AE) in pipelines and addresses, in particular, the effects of the internal and external environment. Specifically, experiments have been carried out on a 5.5 m length of pipe with and without water inside and with various external environments chosen to simulate burial with various levels of soil saturation. The AE signature of a simulated source was recorded at various distances along the pipe with various environments and the data were analysed in the time and frequency domains to isolate the effect of interfaces on the distortion of propagating AE waves. It is shown that AE transmission is affected markedly by both the internal and the external environments, but that some components of the wave are affected less than others. A simple attenuation model is presented, which takes into account the losses at the interfaces, and this suggests that much of the attenuation is attributable to waves moving in the body of the pipe wall rather than on its surface. The findings will be of value in the practical detection and location of active defects in pipes, where the internal and external environments may vary. One might expect a source to generate a particular time-frequency signature, and it is of interest to know how much this source signature will become distorted when sensed at some distance.

Monitoring buried pipe deformation using acoustic emission: quantification of attenuation

“…[Insert Table 3 Shehadeh et al, (2008). The results were expected to be in close agreement because plane modes propagate in both cases.…”

“…The results were expected to be in close agreement because plane modes propagate in both cases. The coefficient in Shehadeh et al, (2008) is lower because solid lengths of pipe were examined with no couplings. The wavelength/wall thickness ratio also influences the attenuation; this ratio was less for the coefficient determined by Shehadeh et al, (2008) than for that determined here.…”

“…losses at boundaries), material properties, and scattering at joints (Long et al, 2003a,b;Shehadeh et al, 2008). Shehadeh et al, (2008) understood that waveguide pipes installed in the ground (e.g. active waveguides) have a combination of air and water (e.g.…”

“…Buried pipes can also have waste or petroleum products as an internal environment. Shehadeh et al, (2008) monitored relatively high frequency (i.e. 100-200 kHz and 300-350 kHz) AE wave propagation in air-steel pipe-air systems and water-steel pipe-wet sand systems.…”

Experimental Investigation Using Acoustic Emission Technique for Quasi-Static Cracks in Steel Pipes Assessment

“…The AE signals are prone to dispersion and attenuation due to the wave elasticity features [9,10], given that the AE signal propagation in thin plates is dispersive due to the varying phase velocities at which several frequencies are propagated [11][12][13][14][15][16]. Consequently, the majority of performed AE monitoring tests showed an interest in specimens with thin plate geometries [11,14].…”