Aspects of housing preference: revisiting a cross-cultural study with the hindsight of improved data analysis

Demographic Effects in Environmental Aesthetics: A Meta-Analysis

“…1 6 20 9 (Tips and Savasdisara 1986) .71 470 1 7 13 11 10 (Kocher 1988) .75 ? 4 31 11 (Groves and Thorne 1988) .85 92 5 13 16 12 (Groat 1989) .97 97 1 3 25 13 (Devlin and Nasar 1989) -.27 40 1 2 40 14 (Nasar and Kang 1989) .55 65 1 7 10 5 15 .91 285 1 2 6 16 (Pennartz and Elsinga 1990) .66 135 1 2 16 17 (Hubbard 1994) .66 75 1 2 5 15 18 (Rodriguez 1995) -.62 40 1 2 40 19 (Kaplan and Herbert 1989) .84 219 4 13 55 20 (Nasar 1984) .71 46 5 24 21 (Purcell et al 1994) .92 192 7 13 12 22 (Zube et al 1983) .73 294 1 9 56 23 (Zube 1974) .78 60 5 6 24 (Strumse 1996) .99 198 4 7 7 25 (Stamps 1991) .67 58 10 11 15 26 (Stamps and Miller 1993) .65 16 2 8 56 27 (Stamps 1996) .92 110 10 11 12 40 28 (Stamps 1992) .10 51 1 8 12 29 (Devlin 1994) .29 214 4 7 9 16 30 (Yang and Brown 1992) .56 660 1 13 40 31 (Peron et al 1998) .84 192 4 13 48 32 (Zube and Pitt 1981) .83 358 1 4 13 56 33 (Kaplan and Herbert 1987) .77 339 4 8 13 60 34 (Ulrich 1977) .88 98 4 13 53 35 (Medina 1983) .51 299 8 9 8 36 (Balling and Faulk 1982) .90 548 1 9 5 37 (Stamps 1999) .98 57 1 8 38 (Wilson 1996) .73 150 5 26 39 (Anderson et al 1976) .92 30 1 2 56 40 (Lyons 1983) . Table 5.)…”

“…Nstim is the number of stimuli, and r is the correlation between the two listed respondent groups. (Brush 1979) .88 20 1 -1 -1 2 (Zube 1973) .74 27 1 -1 -1 3 (Zube and Mills 1976) .84 24 1 -1 -1 (Daniel and Boster 1976) .16 6 1 -1 -1 5 (Buhyoff and Leuschner 1978) .70 10 1 -1 -1 6 .70 9 1 -1 -1 7 (Buhyoff and Wellman 1983) .72 11 1 -1 -1 8 (Kellomaki and Savolainen 1984) .83 20 -1 -1 -1 9 (Tips and Savasdisara 1986) .71 11 -1 -1 -1 10 (Kocher 1988) .75 31 1 -1 -1 11 (Groves and Thorne 1988) .85 16 1 -1 -1 12 (Groat 1989) .97 25 1 -1 -1 13 (Devlin and Nasar 1989) -.27 40 1 -1 -1 14 (Nasar and Kang 1989) .55 5 -1 1 -1 15 .91 6 -1 -1 -1 16 (Pennartz and Elsinga 1990) .66 16 1 -1 -1 17 (Hubbard 1994) .66 15 1 -1 -1 18 (Rodriguez 1995) -.62 40 1 -1 -1 19 (Kaplan and Herbert 1989) .84 55 1 -1 -1 20 (Nasar 1984) .71 24 1 -1 -1 21 (Purcell et al 1994) .92 12 1 -1 -1 22 (Zube et al 1983) .73 56 1 -1 -1 23 (Zube 1974) .78 6 -1 -1 -1 24 (Strumse 1996) .99 7 1 -1 -1 25 (Stamps 1991) .67 15 1 -1 1 26 (Stamps and Miller 1993) .65 56 -1 -1 1 27 (Stamps 1996) .92 40 1 -1 1 28 (Stamps 1992) .10 12 -1 -1 1 29 (Devlin 1994) .29 16 -1 -1 -1 30 (Yang and Brown 1992) .56 40 -1 -1 -1 31 (Peron et al 1998) .84 48 1 -1 -1 32 (Zube and Pitt 1981) .83 56 1 -1 -1 33 (Kaplan and Herbert 1987) .77 60 1 -1 -1 34 (Ulrich 1977) .88 53 -1 -1 -1 35 (Medina 1983) .51 8 -1 -1 -1 36 (Balling and Faulk 1982) .90 5 1 -1 -1 37 (Stamps 1999) .98 8 1 -1 1 38 (Wilson 1996) .73 26 1 -1 -1 39…”

“…Prospective articles were located either by title or by a reviewer's suggestion that the article contained data that compared preferences for different demographic groups. Thus, a title criterion would locate Groves and Thorne's (1988) article on "Aspects of Housing Preferences: Revisiting a Cross-Cultural Study with the Hindsight of Improved Data Analysis," whereas a cross-reference criterion would be needed to locate the demographic data in Daniel and Boster's (1976) article on "Measuring Landscape Aesthetics: The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method. "…”