1995
DOI: 10.1093/jigpal/3.4.597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspects of Paraconsistent Logic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the oldest and best known approaches to paraconsistency is da Costa's approach ( [24,25,28]), which seeks to allow the use of classical logic whenever it is safe to do so, but behaves completely differently when contradictions are involved. This approach has led to the introduction of the family of Logics of Formal (In)consistency (LFIs) ( [17,18]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the oldest and best known approaches to paraconsistency is da Costa's approach ( [24,25,28]), which seeks to allow the use of classical logic whenever it is safe to do so, but behaves completely differently when contradictions are involved. This approach has led to the introduction of the family of Logics of Formal (In)consistency (LFIs) ( [17,18]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They appeared recently, as Marcos, Carnielli and others worked on developing a broad generalization of the C-systems, (cf. [43], [90]), investigated by Newton C. A. da Costa, one of the first pioneeres of paraconsistent logic in Brazil back in the 1950s.…”
Section: Logics Of Formal Inconsistencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paraconsistent logics exclude the Principle of Non-Contradiction ( [43]) which states that from contradictory premises any formula can be derived, thus turning the logic trivial. The first person to discuss the possibility of violating this principle was Lukasiewicz, however he did not develop any logical system to formalize his studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In formal terms: Remark 3.8.2 Axioms (co 1 )-(co 3 ) (where • is a derived connective and not a primitive connective) were proposed by Béziau in [17] for C 1 : specifically, he proposes to substitute in C 1 the three axioms of consistency propagation for binary connectives with their stronger version. This variant of C 1 was additionally studied in [18], under the name C + 1 . The counterpart of C + 1 in signature (that is, the system obtained from mbC by adding axiom schemas (ci), (cl), (cf) and (co 1 )-(co 3 ) is called Cilo (see [1,3]).…”
Section: A Stronger Consistency Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If Cila, which satisfies consistency propagation, also satisfies strong consistency propagation, then it contains Cilo. However, by adapting an argument in [18] for C + 1 and C 1 , the formula ¬( p 1 ∨ ¬p 2 ) → (¬ p 1 ∧ p 2 ) is a theorem in Cilo but not in Cila. This shows that Cila does not satisfy strong consistency propagation, despite satisfiying consistency propagation.…”
Section: A Stronger Consistency Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%