Aspects of representation of library and information science

Abstract

PurposeThis paper seeks to deal with the “image problem” in the library and information science (LIS) profession from the cultural studies viewpoint. It aims to explore representations of LIS in LIS itself and to research the representation practices of LIS in the social and cultural environment.Design/methodology/approachAfter identifying some main features of professional discourse on the LIS image, the empirical part of the research particularly explored two questions: how LIS is constituted and how it is embedded in broader social practices. More than 300 articles were collected from the Slovenian daily newspaper with the largest circulation. The sample was analyzed quantitatively and two‐fold qualitatively.FindingsThe results of quantitative analysis outline the formation of LIS's community nature. The results of qualitative analysis mostly show the signifying practices in differentiating between the “old” and the “modern” and representing practices in creating “zealous” librarians and “suspicious” users. The results also point to librarians as “organic intellectuals”.Research limitations/implicationsThe study is exploratory and at this point the thesis on “organic intellectuals” cannot be confirmed; in addition to the limits in the analysis methods, the theoretical background needs to be further explored. The findings cannot be generalized due to social and cultural differences.Practical implicationsThe methodology can be applied to other research subjects. The results may be helpful for library managers and library public relations work.Originality/valueThere are only a few studies of such theoretical and methodological design that have researched the role of the LIS in society. The paper also analyzes the “image problem” in the daily newspapers.

Behind the glasses and beneath the bun: portrayals of librarians in popular cinema and a guide for developing a collection

“…61-2). Badovinac and Južnic (2011) place a twist on these modern aspects of librarianship, asserting that librarians want to remain in their historically "old" settings while applying modern trends at the same time (Badovinac and Južnic, 2011, p. 308).…”