2015
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1067933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspects of Teaching and Learning Science: What students' diaries reveal about inquiry and traditional modes

Abstract: We present an analysis of students' reflective writing (diaries) of two cohorts of Grade 8 students, one undergoing inquiry and the other traditional science teaching. Students' writing included a summary of what students had learned in class on that day and their opinions and feelings about the class. The entries were analysed qualitatively and quantitatively. This analysis of students' first-person accounts of their learning experience and their notes taken during class was useful in two ways. First, it brou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also excluded three articles that did not include a definition or description of the practical work involved (e.g., Borrows, 2008) as any intrinsic teaching experiences contained in these articles cannot necessarily be associated with IBPW. We also excluded 23 articles on studies focusing mostly or only on learners (e.g., Kawalkar & Vijapurkar, 2015), 10 articles focusing on elementary (primary) science teachers (e.g., Martin & Hand, 2009), and 14 articles on preservice science teachers (e.g., Crawford, 2007). Also excluded was an article on instrument development (Campbell, Abd-Hamid, & Chapman, 2010) and two articles comparing strategies involving practical inquiry and expository instruction (e.g., Pinar & Ceren, 2008).…”
Section: Screening the Search Listmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also excluded three articles that did not include a definition or description of the practical work involved (e.g., Borrows, 2008) as any intrinsic teaching experiences contained in these articles cannot necessarily be associated with IBPW. We also excluded 23 articles on studies focusing mostly or only on learners (e.g., Kawalkar & Vijapurkar, 2015), 10 articles focusing on elementary (primary) science teachers (e.g., Martin & Hand, 2009), and 14 articles on preservice science teachers (e.g., Crawford, 2007). Also excluded was an article on instrument development (Campbell, Abd-Hamid, & Chapman, 2010) and two articles comparing strategies involving practical inquiry and expository instruction (e.g., Pinar & Ceren, 2008).…”
Section: Screening the Search Listmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every learning activity carried out has a goal to achieve. Learning is not a goal, but is a process to achieve goals (Gao & Wang, 2014;Kawalkar & Vijapurkar, 2015;Shirazi, 2017). So, learning is the steps or procedures taken (Lee & Choi, 2017;Stender et al, 2017;Pongsophon & Herman, 2017).…”
Section:  Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent reforms in Science Education have placed emphasis on Inquiry-Based Teaching (IBT) (Gilbert & Justi, 2016;Kawalkar & Vijapurkar, 2015). However, these guidelines haven't been fully implemented in Portuguese schools, perhaps on account of the challenge that adopting these practices represents, and because there is a significant distrust in their contribution for the improvement of teaching.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these guidelines haven't been fully implemented in Portuguese schools, perhaps on account of the challenge that adopting these practices represents, and because there is a significant distrust in their contribution for the improvement of teaching. However, studies have demonstrated the potential of these practices (Kawalkar & Vijapurkar, 2015). The IBT belongs to a Socio-constructivist dimension of learning and aims to contribute to the personal and social development of students, encouraging them to critically participate in today's society.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation