The four acquisition papers in this volume deal with different facets of complementation in the L1 and L2 development of Portuguese. The backdrop for two of these papers is an earlier study by Santos, Gonçalves & Hyams (2016) that looked broadly at the question of which complement types are acquired earliest by European Portuguese-speaking (EP) children and why. Recognizing that a verb may select for a variety of complement types (and Portuguese is especially rich in this regard), Santos et al. wanted to see which complements children would use when given a choice in a sentence completion task. The children were told a story accompanied by pictures and then asked to complete a lead-in sentence with the complement of their choosing. The verbs in the lead-in allowed for various complement types including finite indicative, subjunctive, inflected infinitive, Raising to Object (RtO), among othres. The guiding assumption was that the complement types that children used most often were easier for them and hence mastered earlier than those which occurred less frequently in their answers. In the current volume, Agostinho, Santos & Duarte investigate children's comprehension of control in European Portuguese (EP), complementing the production study just described. Gonçalves, Santos, Duarte and Justino replicate a portion of the Santos et al. production study in children acquiring Mozambican Portuguese, (MozP). Silva's contribution looks at a different aspect of complementation, how children interpret null and overt subject pronouns in indicative and subjunctive complements. Finally, Madeira's study investigates the acquisition of inflected infinitives by Spanish and Chinese L2 learners of EP, evaluating competing hypotheses concerning the degree to which adult L2 learners can successfully acquire structures not available in their L1. Collectively, these papers represent a substantial contribution to the literature on children's development of complementation, and they considerably broaden the empirical base Nina Hyams Commentary 2 of research into Portuguese L1 and L2 acquisition, specifically. As would be expected, some of the findings and claims raise additional questions, especially as regards the status of principles like the Single Argument Selection Hypothesis (SASH) and the Complete Functional Complement Hypothesis (CFC) (Santos et al. 2015), discussed below, and the possible influence of extra-grammatical factors such as frequency, as well as processing and pragmatic effects in the acquisition of complementation. In what follows I offer some brief remarks on these issues. My comments are intended to open up areas for discussion in the hope of pushing forward this ambitious research program on the acquisition of complements in Portuguese and also possibly extending it to other languages. Universal biases: SASH and the CFC in European and Mozambican Portuguese A central finding of Santos et al. (2015) was that EP children (ages 3-5) showed a preference to produce finite complements and inflected infinitives over oth...