1971
DOI: 10.1007/bf02860300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspects of the cold-hardiness mechanism in plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
1
2

Year Published

1975
1975
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 209 publications
4
43
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…& Young 1981;Blanchet 1985), suggest that the seasonal change in frost tolerance of kiwifruit follows a common pattern found in many plant species (Alden & Hermann 1971;Larcher & Bauer 1981;Stanley & Warrington 1984). The plant shows maximum frost tolerance in winter, dehardens in spring and summer, and hardens again in autumn back to maximum winter frost tolerance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…& Young 1981;Blanchet 1985), suggest that the seasonal change in frost tolerance of kiwifruit follows a common pattern found in many plant species (Alden & Hermann 1971;Larcher & Bauer 1981;Stanley & Warrington 1984). The plant shows maximum frost tolerance in winter, dehardens in spring and summer, and hardens again in autumn back to maximum winter frost tolerance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…If this is true, the ribosome may be altered to function at lower temperatures. The cytoplasm of the cell is greatly altered during induction of hardiness (1,23). Perhaps the ribesome must adapt to remain active in this altered cytoplasmic environment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative effect of temperature and its shifts in the dormant period (Fig. 2) might be explained by cold dehardening in response to thaws (Alden and Herman 1971;Cox and Stushnoff 2001), thus subjecting trees to stronger cold damage in a following drop of temperature (Hänninen 2006). Increased winter temperature can also burden dormancy and cause a depletion of nutrient reserves due to respiration (Foote and Scheadle 1976;Ögren et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%