1976
DOI: 10.2527/jas1976.4261513x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspen Bark and Pulp Residue for Ruminant Feedstuffs3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The digestibility of both wood and bark can be improved by physical and chemical treatments. In one feeding trial it was observed that pure aspen bark in pellets was not palatable to ~a t t l e .~ Another study indicated that aspen bark was readily accepted in rations fed to sheep (Fritschel et al 1976). …”
Section: Aspen Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The digestibility of both wood and bark can be improved by physical and chemical treatments. In one feeding trial it was observed that pure aspen bark in pellets was not palatable to ~a t t l e .~ Another study indicated that aspen bark was readily accepted in rations fed to sheep (Fritschel et al 1976). …”
Section: Aspen Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3), then returned to the initial levels at 24h post feeding. However, Fritschel et al (1976) Sharma and Ingalls (1974) (Church 1976). The other explanation of the lowerpH observed in the present studies is a possible insufficiency of salivary secretion and the poor buffering capacity of the saliva of these sheep as has been suggested by Oltjen et al (1965) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%