2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspiration-Based Partner Switching Boosts Cooperation in Social Dilemmas

Abstract: Most previous studies concerning linking dynamics often assumed that links pairing individuals should be identified and treated differently during topology adjusting procedure, in order to promote cooperation. A common assumption was that cooperators were expected to avoid being exploited by quickly breaking up relationships with defectors. Then the so-called prosocial links linking two cooperators (abbreviated as CC links hereafter) would be much favored by evolution, whereby cooperation was promoted. However… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Amazingly, promotion effect on cooperation with Moore neighborhood, in fact, appears even far stronger than that for von Neumann neighborhood in this figure. This phenomenon differs apparently from previous observations concerning dynamically organized partnerships [91][92][93][94] and also yeast societies [95], where authors argue that denser networks often exhibit apparent propensity to deter the establishment of cooperation. The existence of M opt emphasizes that rewarding agents whose strategy popularity slightly oversteps half size of their neighborhoods (referred to as the minimum majority) most benefits the evolution of cooperation no matter in which kind of games.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Amazingly, promotion effect on cooperation with Moore neighborhood, in fact, appears even far stronger than that for von Neumann neighborhood in this figure. This phenomenon differs apparently from previous observations concerning dynamically organized partnerships [91][92][93][94] and also yeast societies [95], where authors argue that denser networks often exhibit apparent propensity to deter the establishment of cooperation. The existence of M opt emphasizes that rewarding agents whose strategy popularity slightly oversteps half size of their neighborhoods (referred to as the minimum majority) most benefits the evolution of cooperation no matter in which kind of games.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Du et al [32] affirmed that the effects of aspiration level on average abundance function in structured population under weak selection intensity is similar to that in well-mixed population. Li et al [33] corroborated that the combination of aspiration rule and modified selfquestioning mechanism leads to the increasing of average abundance function.…”
Section: The Comparison Between Aspiration Rule and Imitation Rulementioning
confidence: 91%
“…For example, Axelrod in [5] considered individuals on a twodimensional square lattice, where interactions would only happen within local neighborhoods. Vainstein et al [44] extended the model of Nowak and May [29] by considering a regular lattice where some vacant sites permit the individuals to diffuse easily; see also [32,38,7,4,48,22,43,1] for other models of dynamic networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%