2015
DOI: 10.1186/2197-425x-3-s1-a227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspirin and statin therapy in sepsis, a red herring?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plasma levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; A), blood urea nitrogen (BUN; B), and aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT; C) in cecal ligation and puncture (CLP)-and sham-operated mice, 20 h after transfusion of Tyrode's albumin buffer (buffer) without platelets, 1.4 × 10 9 wild-type (WT)washed platelets, WT-washed platelets treated with clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), or platelet factor 4 (PF4)-β3 −/−washed platelets treated with clopidogrel and ASA. Results are the mean ± standard error of the mean antiplatelet therapy in sepsis and the available reports, mostly retrospective, have generated variable results with either a beneficial effect of antiplatelet drugs [22][23][24]55 or no effect [27][28][29][30] on the severity and outcome of sepsis. Ongoing randomized controlled clinical trials may be expected to provide a definitive answer as to whether antiplatelet therapy can modulate the severity of the outcome in patients with sepsis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Plasma levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; A), blood urea nitrogen (BUN; B), and aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT; C) in cecal ligation and puncture (CLP)-and sham-operated mice, 20 h after transfusion of Tyrode's albumin buffer (buffer) without platelets, 1.4 × 10 9 wild-type (WT)washed platelets, WT-washed platelets treated with clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), or platelet factor 4 (PF4)-β3 −/−washed platelets treated with clopidogrel and ASA. Results are the mean ± standard error of the mean antiplatelet therapy in sepsis and the available reports, mostly retrospective, have generated variable results with either a beneficial effect of antiplatelet drugs [22][23][24]55 or no effect [27][28][29][30] on the severity and outcome of sepsis. Ongoing randomized controlled clinical trials may be expected to provide a definitive answer as to whether antiplatelet therapy can modulate the severity of the outcome in patients with sepsis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 The dichotomy of platelets in their beneficial or detrimental effects in sepsis questions the potential benefit of inhibition of platelet hemostatic functions to attenuate tissue injury and improve outcomes in sepsis. Numerous clinical studies, mostly retrospective, have generated variable results with either beneficial effect of antiplatelet drugs [22][23][24][25][26] or no effect [27][28][29][30] on sepsis severity or outcome. Preclinical studies in animal models of sepsis reported conflicting results using clopidogrel with either no protective role 31,32 or a reduced sepsis-induced inflammation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings indicating a lack of any beneficial impact of clopidogrel treatment on the pathogenesis of sepsis and septic shock in mice, question whether clopidogrel treatment might be beneficial in septic patients. Numerous clinical trials have generated variable results with either beneficial effect of antiplatelet drugs [19][20][21][22][23]49 or no effect [24][25][26][27] on sepsis severity or outcome. However, most clinical studies were retrospective, of small size and/or included patient groups that were not matched for potential confounding factors, such as comorbidity and other chronic medication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antiplatelet drugs such as acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and P2Y 12 receptor targeting drugs, including the thienopyridine compounds clopidogrel and prasugrel and direct antagonists such as ticagrelor, are the cornerstone of the treatment and secondary prevention of arterial thrombosis. 17,18 However, clinical studies related to antiplatelet therapy of sepsis generated discordant results with several studies showing a survival benefit in septic patients receiving ASA [19][20][21] or antiplatelet agents (ASA and others), 22,23 while others showed no better outcome after ASA 24,25 or antiplatelet agents. 26,27 In addition, there are only few reports on the effects of antiplatelet drugs in animal models of sepsis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these studies point to the direction that sepsis patients on antiplatelet therapy have survival benefits [6][7][8], which are attributed to the drug's anti-inflammatory properties in addition to their antiaggregatory effects, as determined by experimental studies [9][10][11]. Other studies did not confirm benefits on severity and outcome, however, and the hypercoagulable state in sepsis remains difficult to manage [12][13][14]. One reason for limited success of antiplatelet drugs is high on-treatment platelet reactivity during sepsis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%