2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-009-0915-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aspirin Use and the Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract: This meta-analysis indicated that regular use of aspirin may be associated with reduced risk of noncardia gastric cancer, especially among Caucasians; for H. pylori-infected subjects the result was similar.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
50
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Epidemiological studies suggest that the long-term use of NSAIDs decreases the incidence of and mortality from gastrointestinal cancers [30,31]. The principal pharmacological effects of NSAIDs are due to their ability to inhibit COX-2 and prostaglandin synthesis [32,33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epidemiological studies suggest that the long-term use of NSAIDs decreases the incidence of and mortality from gastrointestinal cancers [30,31]. The principal pharmacological effects of NSAIDs are due to their ability to inhibit COX-2 and prostaglandin synthesis [32,33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, we could find some mistakes about data abstracting in one meta-analysis. This also happened in the topic about the relationships between aspirin use and GC risk (Tian et al, 2010;Yang et al, 2010). One meta-analysis (Yang et al, 2010) included one RCT (Cook et al, 2005) and another PCC study (Figueroa et al, 2009) than the first one (Tian et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Two metaanalyses (Tian et al, 2010;Yang et al, 2010) evaluated the relationships between aspirin use and GC risk, but they were different in their ORs, as one meta-analysis included one RCT (Cook et al, 2005) and another PCC study (Figueroa et al, 2009). So the other meta analysis (Yang et al, 2010) were much more comprehensive than the first one (Tian et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more recent review of 14 studies looking at aspirin and gastric cancer (one RCT and 13 observational) conducted a meta-analysis and found no overall effect of aspirin (odds ratio [OR]* = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.54 to 1.19), although when analysis was restricted to three RCT or cohort studies (that is, higher quality studies) there was a significant reduction in the incidence of gastric cancer (OR* = 0.74 (95% CI = 0.63 to 0.86). 9 Although the authors of these reviews highlight certain methodological limitations, and the need to interpret the findings with caution, they do suggest a possible association between aspirin use and a reduced incidence of non-colon GI cancers.…”
Section: Aspirin and Cancer Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%