Interspeech 2019 2019
DOI: 10.21437/interspeech.2019-2091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ASR Inspired Syllable Stress Detection for Pronunciation Evaluation Without Using a Supervised Classifier and Syllable Level Features

Abstract: Automatic syllable stress detection is typically performed with a supervised classifier considering manually annotated stress markings and features computed within the syllable segments derived from phoneme transcriptions and their time-aligned boundaries. However, the manual annotation is tedious and the errors in estimating segmental information could degrade stress detection accuracy. In order to circumvent these, we propose to estimate stress markings in automatic speech recognition (ASR) framework involvi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two popular variants: a) discriminating syllables between primary stress/no stress [13], and b) classifying between primary stress/secondary stress/no stress [51,54]. Ramanathi et al [55] have followed an alternative unsupervised way of classifying lexical stress, which is based on computing the likelihood of an acoustic signal for a number of possible lexical stress representations of a word.…”
Section: Lexical Stress Error Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two popular variants: a) discriminating syllables between primary stress/no stress [13], and b) classifying between primary stress/secondary stress/no stress [51,54]. Ramanathi et al [55] have followed an alternative unsupervised way of classifying lexical stress, which is based on computing the likelihood of an acoustic signal for a number of possible lexical stress representations of a word.…”
Section: Lexical Stress Error Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%