Assault-injured youth in the emergency centres of Khayelitsha, South Africa: A prospective study of recidivism and mortality

Abstract

Introduction Violence is a major cause of death worldwide among youth. The highest mortality rates from youth violence occur in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). We sought to identify risk factors for violent re-injury and emergency centre (EC) recidivism among assault-injured youth in South Africa. Methods A prospective follow up study of assault injured youth and controls ages 14–24 presenting for emergency care was conducted in Khayelitsha, South Africa from 2016 to 2018. Sociodemographic and behavioral factors were assessed using a questionnaire administered during the index EC visit. The primary outcomes were return EC visit for violent injury or death within 15 months. We used multivariable logistic regression to compute adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of associations between return EC visits and key demographic, social, and behavioral factors among assault-injured youth. Results Our study sample included 320 assault-injured patients and 185 non-assault-injured controls. Of the assault-injured, 80% were male, and the mean age was 20.8 years. The assault-injured youth was more likely to have a return EC visit for violent injury (14%) compared to the control group (3%). The non-assault-injured group had a higher mortality rate (7% vs 3%). All deaths in the control group were due to end-stage HIV or TB-related complications. The strongest risk factors for return EC visit were prior criminal activity (OR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.1–5.1), and current enrollment in school (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.0–4.6). Although the assault-injured group reported high rates of binge drinking (73%) at the index visit, this was not found to be a risk factor for violence-related EC recidivism. Discussion Our findings suggest that assault-injured youth in an LMIC setting are at high risk of EC recidivism and several sociodemographic and behavioral factors are associated with increased risk. These findings can inform targeted intervention programs.

Covid-induced intimate partner violence: scoping review from Africa between 2020 and 2022

“…This upholds findings from previous studies (Gibbs et al, 2020;Izugbara et al, 2020;Peterman et al, 2022) that reported mental health issues as the number one impact of IPV on victims. This contradicts some pre-pandemic studies (Leeper et al, 2021;Temesgan et al, 2021;Tiruye et al, 2020) that reported death, body injury, abortion and miscarriage, sexually transmitted diseases like HIV/AIDS, and divorce as impacts of IPV. However, given the limited opportunities for reporting IPV incidence during the pandemic, it was possible that the incidence of death, abortion, and other consequences of IPV that occurred were not recorded.…”

Covid-Induced Intimate Partner Violence: Scoping Review from Africa between 2020 – 2022

“…Though, some pre-pandemic studies, data collected before the pandemic (i.e. Leeper et al, 2021;Temesgan et al, 2021;Tiruye et al, 2020) reported death, body injury, abortion and miscarriage, sexually transmitted diseases such as HIV/AIDS, and divorce as impacts of IPV, none of these emerged in the current study. This was probably the case because during the pandemic, there were limited opportunities for reporting incidence of IPV.…”